This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Financial instruments — Impairment

Date recorded:

At its July 2012 meeting, the IASB substantially completed deliberations of a “three bucket” impairment model for financial assets.

During this meeting, the IASB staff noted that it had conducted extensive outreach over the summer months to understand constituent views about the “three bucket” impairment model. While the IASB staff intends to present this feedback at the October 2012 Board meeting, the staff provided high-level observations of its feedback at this meeting.

Feedback suggested that more clarity should be provided regarding when financial assets should move from Bucket 1 to Buckets 2 or 3 under the “three bucket” impairment model. However, the staff also heard support for not pursuing a model where you recognise lifetime expected losses on initial recognition of financial assets. Instead, it was important that the impairment model distinguish deterioration in financial asset quality; thereby suggesting that constituents were not supportive of a model which applies the concept of expected losses in a single measurement approach (more akin to a model which the FASB is currently considering).

Hearing this feedback, many IASB members wanted to discuss specifics of the model the FASB is considering. The FASB staff, who attended this meeting, noted they would be sharing the specifics of the FASB’s tentative model in October, and as such, preferred to not discuss specifics of that model at this time. The IASB was not asked to make any tentative decisions as a result of the high-level feedback provided.

Related Meeting Notes


Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.