This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.

IAS 38 — Items not added to the agenda

Background

This page presents a summary of items not added to the IFRS Interpretations Committee's agenda in relation to IAS 38 Intangible Assets together with the Committee's public explanation of the reasons for not adding those items to its agenda.

Related Discussions

  • IAS 38 — Amortisation method

  • Jan 07, 2010

  • The IFRIC received requests for guidance on the meaning of 'consumption of economic benefits' when determining the appropriate amortisation method for an intangible asset with a finite useful life. The methods considered in the submissions are the straight-line method and the unit of production method (including a revenue-based unit of production method).

  • IAS 38 — Compliance costs for REACH

  • Jul 09, 2009

  • The IFRIC received a request to add an item to its agenda to provide guidance on the treatment of costs incurred to comply with the requirements of the European Regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).

  • IAS 38 — Classification and accounting for SIM cards

  • Nov 01, 2006

  • The IFRIC received a request for an Interpretation as to whether a mobile phone operator should account for a Subscriber Identity Module (or ‘SIM card’) as an intangible asset in accordance with IAS 38 or as inventory in accordance with IAS 2.

  • IAS 38 — Adoption of IAS 38 (revised 2004)

  • Nov 01, 2006

  • The IFRIC received a request for guidance on whether the consequential amendments made to IAS 38 in December 2003 (as a result of improvements to IAS 16) should be applied retrospectively or prospectively if an entity adopted the March 2004 version of IAS 38 early.

  • IAS 38 — Regulatory asset

  • Aug 02, 2005

  • The IFRIC considered a request for guidance for operations subject to price regulation. The request concerned situations in which a regulatory agreement allowed the entity to increase its prices in future years to recover outflows of economic resources during the current or previous years.

All Related