This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice (http://www2.deloitte.com/ca/en/legal/cookies.html) for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Hans Hoogervorst speaks about historical cost and fair value

  • IFRS - IASB Image
  • IFRS  - Speech Image

Jun 29, 2015

On June 29, 2015, at the IFRS Foundation's IFRS conference held in Paris, the International Accounting Standards Board Chairman Hans Hoogervorst spoke about the question of how assets and liabilities should be measured, a topic he called "one of the most difficult topics in accounting".

Mr. Hoogervorst referred to the recently published Exposure Draft on the new Conceptual Framework which includes a chapter on measurement offering a description of different measurement bases, the information that they provide and their advantages and disadvantages. In this chapter, the IASB has divided the measurement techniques into two categories: historical cost and current value.

Mr. Hoogervorst pointed out that "the dichotomy between historical cost and fair value is not as stark as one would expect". He listed four aspects where the assumed stability of historical cost and the often cited vulnerability of current value are not necessarily that far apart. He cited (i) the fact that, for many transactions, historical cost starts and ends with fair value (or values that come very close to it); (ii) that, despite its name, historical cost gets updated too (depreciation/amortization); (iii) that the alleged stability resulting from historical cost accounting can be extremely misleading; and (iv) that the stability of historical cost can be interrupted by steep cliff effects.

Mr. Hoogervorst also stated that it would not do to abandon historical costs completely in favor of fair value. Instead, he noted in "very broad brushstrokes indeed" the following general conclusions as to when the different categories of measurement bases should be applied: (i) if the nature of business activities is to use assets in combination with other assets to produce goods or services, this generally points in the direction of historical cost; (ii) if the nature of business activities is to trade assets or liabilities in active markets, this would generally point in the direction of current value measurement; (iii) if the characteristics of an asset of a liability are such that they are highly sensitive to market factors or to other risks in the item, this would generally point in the direction of current value measurement.

He also noted of course that more factors than these will need to be taken into consideration, such as the cost of performing the measurement, the degree of measurement uncertainty, faithful presentation and the avoidance of accounting mismatches. He encouraged his audience to comment on the proposals in the IASB's Exposure Draft.

The full transcript of Chairman Hoogervorst’s speech is available on the IASB’s website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.