The overall objective of the review is to update the Principles in light of recent evolutions in capital markets and corporate governance policies and practices. OECD and G20 countries have identified a range of priority areas to take into consideration during the review, including the management of environmental, social and governance risks; digitalisation; changes in corporate ownership and concentration; and the role of institutional investors and stewardship, among others. An important overarching aim of the revision is to support strengthened corporate sector resilience and to improve companies’ access to finance from capital markets.

Review the following on the OECD's website:

• Press release
• Public consultation
• Consultation document

Among other matters, the Staff Alert highlights the ethical implications arising from the wide-ranging economic sanctions many jurisdictions have imposed on Russia and certain Russian entities and individuals as well as Belarus, and the related ethical responsibilities of PAIBs and PAPPs under the Code. It also highlights:

• Key ethics considerations for PAIBs in relation to the preparation and presentation of information, especially as regards accounting for and disclosing the impact of the Ukraine conflict on their employing organizations’ business; and
• Key ethics considerations for PAPPs in relation to client and engagement acceptance, and in the context of audits of financial statements, key independence considerations relating to overdue fees and the Code’s prohibition against assuming management responsibility.

Review the press release and publication on the IESBA's website.

The Agenda items in­cluded:

• Sustainability
• Rollout of Revised Public Interest Entity (PIE) Definition
• IFAC Panel on Accounting Education
• Tax Planning & Related Services
• Emerging Issues and Outreach Committee (EIOC)
• IAASB-IESBA Coordination
• Technology Fact Finding and Thought Leadership
• Engagement Team - Group Audits Independence

Re­view the high­lights sum­mary and pod­cast on the IESBA's web­site.

Together with the recently issued fee-related revisions to the Code, the NAS revisions significantly strengthen the International Independence Standards by addressing public interest concerns about independence when firms provide NAS to their audit clients. The development of the Q&As has been informed by the IESBA’s deliberations in the project to revise the NAS provisions and extensive consultations with a wide range of stakeholders, including regulators and audit oversight bodies, the investor and corporate governance communities, national standard setters, firms and professional accountancy organizations.

The publication complements the Basis for Conclusions for the final NAS pronouncement and is intended to assist national standards setters, professional accountancy organizations, and professional accountants in public practice as they adopt and/or implement the revised NAS provisions. The Q&As will also assist other stakeholders, including regulators and audit oversight bodies, those charged with governance, investors, preparers, and academics and other educators better understand the key changes to the NAS provisions of the Code. These changes include the new requirements and guidance that:

• Prohibit a firm or a network firm from providing a NAS that might create a self-review threat to an audit client that is a public interest entity.
• Explain how firms are to determine when a self-review threat to independence might be created, including in relation to providing advice and recommendations to an audit client.
• Are relevant in applying the Code’s conceptual framework to identify, evaluate, and address threats to independence that might be created when an audit firm provides a NAS to an audit client.
• Enable and promote more robust communication and engagement about independence matters relating to NAS between audit firms and those charged with governance of public interest entities.

The revised NAS provisions are effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2022.

Review the press release and Q&A on the IESBA's website.

The IESBA believes that to meet the sustainability information needs of investors, customers, employees or potential employees, government agencies and other stakeholders, the infrastructure that supports sustainability reporting and assurance must be underpinned by the highest standards of ethical behavior.

Review the press release and response on the IESBA's website.

The IESBA has tasked its recently established Sustainability Working Group to develop a strategic vision to guide the IESBA’s standard-setting actions in relation to sustainability reporting and assurance. The Working Group will prepare a project plan by December 2022 as a launchpad for commencement of standard-setting work soon after.

This work will proceed in tandem with the development of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), and sustainability-related International Standards on Assurance Engagements (ISAEs) by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).

The IESBA recognizes the importance of coordinating this work closely with the ISSB and IAASB so that coherent, mutually reinforcing building blocks of standards can be put in place around the same time to support the necessary regulatory infrastructure for sustainability reporting.

Review the press release on the IESBA's website.

The one-hour, live-streamed conversation provided key insights about the applicability of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) to the preparation and presentation of sustainability information and the provision of assurance thereon.

Watch the video on the IESBA's website.

Both webinars provided an overview of the exposure draft and opportunities for stakeholders to participate in a questions and answers session with the presenters. 

• Click here for the April 11 Webinar: presented by Ms. Caroline Lee, IESBA Deputy Chair and Chair of the IESBA’s Engagement Team – Group Audits Independence (ET-GA) Task Force, and Ms. Denise Canavan, former IESBA Technical Advisor and member of the ET-GA Task Force
• Click here for the April 19 Webinar: presented by Ms. Caroline Lee and Mr. Andrew Pinkney, IESBA Technical Advisor and member of the ET-GA Task Force

The proposals in the Exposure Draft establish provisions that comprehensively address independence considerations for firms and individuals involved in an engagement to perform an audit of group financial statements. The proposals also address the independence implications of the change in the definition of an engagement team―a concept central to an audit of financial statements―in the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board's (IAASB) International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 220, Quality Management for an Audit of Financial Statements. The proposals were developed in close coordination with the IAASB's group audits and quality management projects.

Review the press release on the IESBA's website.

Review the press release and article on the IESBA's website.

Review the article.