This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice (http://www2.deloitte.com/ca/en/legal/cookies.html) for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

IESBA Proposed Changes to the Code of Ethics: Section 600, Provision of Non-Assurance Services to an Audit Client (Potential Amendments to Harmonized Rule of Professional Conduct, Rule 204) [Research]

Next steps:

At its December 2019 meeting, IESBA will review a revised set of proposals from the task force with a view to approving an Exposure Draft to be issued in early 2020

Last up­dated:

September 2019

 

Overview

    Har­mo­nized provin­cial Rule 204 sets out the Cana­dian pro­fes­sion’s stan­dards that en­sure Char­tered Pro­fes­sional Ac­coun­tants (CPAs) main­tain au­di­tor in­de­pen­dence dur­ing en­gage­ments they un­der­take or par­tic­i­pate in. It sets the stan­dards and re­quire­ments CPAs must main­tain as part of their pro­fes­sional con­duct. Ethics stan­dards adopted by Cana­dian provin­cial bod­ies are cre­ated in align­ment with the Code of Ethics for Pro­fes­sional Ac­coun­tants is­sued by the In­ter­na­tional Ethics Stan­dards Board for Ac­coun­tants (IESBA).  Hence, changes to the IESBA Code of Ethics will need to be re­flected in Rule 204.

    This project was approved by the IESBA at its meeting in September 2018. The objective of the project is to ensure that all of the Non-Assurance Services (NAS) provisions in the Code of Ethics are robust and of high quality for global application, thereby increasing confidence in the independence of audit firms.

    The overall purpose of the project will involve the development of provisions in the Code that provide a clear and principles based approach, consistent with the conceptual framework, to the circumstances in which firms and network firms may be permitted to provide NAS to audit clients. This includes reconsidering the use of the terms “materiality” and “trivial and inconsequential”. It will also consider (i) new and emerging services; (ii) whether to include the IAASB’s requirements for auditor communication with those charged with governance in the Code; (iii) NAS disclosure requirements; and (iv) other factors.

    For fur­ther de­tails about the pro­ject, re­fer to the IESBA’s pro­ject sum­mary.

     

    Other developments

    September 2018

    At its meeting on September 17-20, 2018, the IESBA approved the proposal for this project.

     

    Re­lated dis­cus­sions

    Section 600, Non-Assurance Services – IESBA

    September 2019

    • At its meeting on September 16-19, 2019, the IESBA continued its discussion of the proposed revisions to Section 600 of the Code and this took up a significant amount of time over the course of the four days. After reviewing the principles that underlie the project proposals, the Board then comprehensively and carefully reviewed the draft text of the proposed changes with the project task force. The task force will update the text of the proposed revisions prior to the December 2019 meeting of the IESBA with a view to having the Board approve an Exposure Draft at that meeting which would be issued for comment in early 2020.

    June 17, 2019

    • At its meeting on June 17-19, 2019, the IESBA considered a first-read draft of proposed revisions to Section 600, Provision of Non Assurance Services to an Audit Client, including the subsections. Among other matters, the IESBA deliberated: (i) the proposed provisions relating to prohibiting firms and network firms from providing NAS to audit clients that are PIEs when those NAS might create self-review threats; (ii) the proposed provisions addressing communication with TCWG about specific NAS matters, including pre-approval of NAS by TCWG for audit clients that are PIEs; (iii) the ordering and flow of the material in the subsections; and (iv) proposed refinements and other clarifications to subsection 604 relating to tax. At its September 2019 meeting, the IESBA will consider a revised set of proposals with a view to approving an exposure draft.

    March 11, 2019

    • At its meeting on March 11-13, 2019, the IESBA provided input on key policy decisions and the indicative direction to the Task Force in relation to its proposed revisions to Section 600. Among other matters, the Board deliberated the following topics: (i) whether the Code should prohibit firms and network firms from providing NAS to audit clients that are public interest entities (PIEs) if the outcome of that service might be included directly or indirectly in the financial statements, and the service creates or might create a self-review threat; (ii) whether the Code should explicitly address communication with those charged with governance (TCWG) about NAS matters, including, for PIEs, a requirement for firms and network firms to obtain pre-approval of the NAS from TCWG; (iii) whether the Code should establish a particular threshold for NAS fees vs. audit fees that would require firms and network firms to re-evaluate threats to independence; (iv) whether and, if so, how and under what circumstances there should be enhanced transparency by firms regarding the ratio of NAS fees and audit fees to: (a) TCWG; and (b) the public (the IESBA noted the need for coordination with the Fees Task Force on this particular matter). The IESBA will progress its deliberations and consider a first-read draft of the proposed changes to the Code at its June 2019 meeting.

    December 2018

    • At its meeting on December 3-5, 2018, the IESBA considered the NAS Task Force’s initial views about possible revisions to Section 600. Among other matters, the Board deliberated the following topics: (i) whether the revised and restructured Code should prohibit firms from providing NAS to audit clients that are public interest entities (PIEs) when such NAS create or might create self-review threats; (ii) whether there should continue to be a distinction in the NAS provisions in the Code for audit clients that are PIEs and audit clients that are not PIEs; (iii) whether there should be clarifications to explain the application of the concept of materiality in the NAS provisions in the Code; (iv) whether the Code should include more explicit provisions regarding auditor communication with those charged with governance about NAS matters, including, for example, whether pre-approval should be obtained for the provision of NAS to audit clients. The IESBA will progress its deliberations, including proposed changes to Section 600 of the Code, at its March 2019 meeting. 

    Correction list for hyphenation

    These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.