This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice ( for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) series #1: Refocus your risk assessment lens

Published on: Jun 26, 2018

Uncover ICFR insights and guidance: ​In response to increased regulatory focus, our ICFR series explores the benefits of a proactive versus reactive system for internal controls to help your organization improve its ICFR program—and save costs along the way.

The starting point to evaluate the sufficiency of an ICFR program should be with a financial statement risk assessment. The risk assessment, which includes specific financial reporting objectives and identification of risks to achieving those objectives, answers these fundamental questions:

  • Which controls are necessary to address the company's risks?
  • How many controls does the company need?
  • What is "just enough" for the company's ICFR program?

A risk assessment that integrates the right people, processes, tools, and techniques serves to identify the relevant risks of material misstatement (ROMMs). The risk assessment also includes the selection of controls and the evaluation of the design of the control in regard to the ROMM. It's through the risk assessment process that a company can report with confidence the number and types of controls necessary to have an effective ICFR system.

What can management do to refresh their lens?

Management's focus on ICFR should start with determining whether the company's risk assessment process is sufficient to identify and assess the risks to reliable financial reporting, including changes in those risks. Proactive steps management can consider include:

  • Refreshing the risk assessment program to incorporate the right people, processes, and technologies to unlock the hidden value.
  • Integrating data analytics and visualization to improve the quality of the data analyzed to support robust risk identification and report results succinctly to key stakeholders. This, in turn, can rationalize risks of material misstatement to a level of granularity to focus on what could truly be a material misstatement.

This publication was released by our US firm.


Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.