This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Fair Value Measurement

Date recorded:

Measuring the Fair Value of Alternative Investments

The Board considered the requirements under US GAAP (ASU 2009-12 Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its equivalent)).

The Board agreed not to provide a practical expedient by allowing entities applying IFRSs to use net asset value (NAV) as an estimate of fair value for alternative investments. The Board was concerned that such a practical expedient would be not operational as under IFRSs there are not specific accounting requirements how to calculate the NAV.

Some Board members noted that in many cases the NAV would be the best estimate of fair value as NAV would be the exit price of the investment. On the other hand, in different fact patterns NAV would be inconsistent which the objective of fair value measurement (for example, investment that could be redeemed at NAV, which consists of investment of that generates higher return). Therefore, the Board decided not to include the US guidance that is jurisdiction specific in the Fair Value Measurement Standard and explain its rationale in the Basis for Conclusions.

Related Topics

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.