This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Conceptual framework — Presentation and disclosure

Date recorded:

The Staff member went through the changes comparing to the previous draft of the paper:

  • simplify the description of the objective of primary financial statements;
  • include a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of aggregation;
  • simplify and focus the discussion of the relationship between primary financial statements; the term ‘cohesiveness’ has been removed to avoid confusion with the cohesiveness principles proposed in the Financial Statement Presentation project;
  • clarify what types of ‘forward-looking’ and risk information should be included in the financial statements; and
  • remove some discussion on faithful representation and replace it with a discussion about communication principles.

The main discussion concerned the materiality concept in the presentation and disclosure chapter of the Conceptual Framework.

One Board member believed that the discussion of materiality (in paragraph 48) was one-sided, i.e. do not provide information if it is too costly. However, there might be instances when the information is so vital that the cost should not be a consideration.

Another Board member believed that materiality should be discussed in more detail. For example, the fact that an item was material in the balance sheet did not automatically mean that all disclosure requirements were material / relevant as well.

The Staff member explained that the DP was aimed at the IASB and not at the preparers; nevertheless, there was a concern from several Board members that materiality needed to be explained better.

Another discussion was around cohesiveness and whether the principle should be moved back in.

A couple of Board members wondered whether the section on Communication Principles should say anything about digital communications.

The Staff will revise the paper based on the feedback from the discussion.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.