This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

2015 Agenda consultation

Date recorded:

Draft work plan: Advisory Council Feedback — Agenda paper 24


The Board developed its draft work plan to 2021 in May 2016. The plan was discussed with the IFRS Advisory Council in June 2016 and will be discussed with ASAF in July 2016. The purpose of this session is for the staff to present the comments received from the Advisory Council and provide an oral update on comments received from ASAF. The staff will also present the feedback received from the Global Preparers Forum (GPF).

The Board will be asked to comment on the revised draft work plan which is included in Appendix A of this agenda paper.  The staff plans to bring for discussion at future meetings a draft of the feedback statement which will include points suggested by the Advisory Council.

Feedback from the Advisory Council

The staff indicates that the Advisory Council was supportive of the Board’s work plan strategy which will focus on (i) increase communication effectiveness; (ii) implementation and support of consistent application; and (iii) design the research programme to make it realistic and achievable. The Advisory Council also suggested that the Board should clearly communicate that the work plan is flexible to address emerging issues and the next period will focus on implementation activities (which could lead to a busy period rather than one of calm).

The Advisory Council agreed with the key factors considered by the Board in developing the research programme. The Advisory Council agreed with (i) evidence-gathering is a major function of the Board research’s activities; (ii) the proposed reduction in the number of active research projects; (iii) the setting up of a research pipeline. The Advisory Council did not object to the composition of the active research programme and the research pipeline. The Advisory Council also suggested that the Board should: (i) explain how research forms an integral part of its technical activities; (ii) explain how some projects from the research programme will become standard-setting projects; and (iii) clarify the process for starting work on projects that are in the research pipeline.

Feedback from the GPF

The staff noted that some members objected to not including in the draft work plan topics related to (i) problems that can arise from the interaction between IAS 29 and IAS 21; and (ii) deferred tax on intercompany transfer of assets.

Presentation of the work plan

The staff suggest to introduce some changes in the presentation of the work plan. The changes are: (i) present the active research programme and the standard-setting projects in one table; (ii) include the next project milestone; (iii) present first projects that focus on communication; and (iii) present the research programme separately.

Related Topics

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.