This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

ESMA comment letter on the role of the business model in financial statements

  • ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) (dark gray) Image

27 Jun 2014

The European Securities and markets authority (ESMA) has published a comment letter in response to the research paper published by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), the French Autorité des Normes Comptables (ANC), and the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) on the role of the business model in financial statements (“the research paper”).

The research paper, published in December 2013, concludes that the business model should continue to play a role in financial reporting, that it is time for a change to the current ad-hoc use and that the concept of the business model should be included in the Conceptual Framework with appropriate guidance for standard-setting.

ESMA agrees that the use of the business model at a standard level “could result in more relevant information on the financial performance, financial position and cash flows of any entity and assist investors in their risk assessment and economic decisions”.  However ESMA comments that “the use of different accounting treatments for different business models could harm comparability amongst issuers”.  It argues that when deciding upon such an approach “there should be a duly justified trade-off between relevance and comparability of the information” and that this decision should be made at a standards level.

Regarding inclusion of the business model concept in the Conceptual Framework, ESMA believe that “a general provision that the ‘business model’ should be assessed when setting individual standards could be sufficient”.  It comments that introducing a too broad a definition of ‘business model’ “might lead to too many different accounting models not justified by fundamental differences between business models”.

The full comment letter can be accessed on the ESMA website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.