FRC responds to IASB and IFRS Foundation consultations

  • FRC comment letter Image

01 Dec, 2015

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has responded to the IASB's Request for Views on its 2015 Agenda Consultation. Although they have responded to the consultation, the FRC believes that the Trustees of the IFRS Foundation should agree a strategic direction for standard-setting before the IASB consults on an agenda. They have expressed this view to the IFRSF in response to their Review of Structure and Effectiveness.

In responding to the IASB's 2015 Agenda Consultation, the FRC makes the following key points.

  • Once the revised IFRS Conceptual Framework is issued, they strongly urge the IASB to continue to update specific areas of the Framework.
  • They support the IASB's Disclosure Initiative and consider that the main focus of the project should be on the upcoming Discussion Paper on Principles of Disclosure.
  • In terms of research projects, they believe that priority should be given to performance reporting research as part of the Primary financial sstatements project.
  • In the context of maintenance and implementation projects, they note that a large number of changes can be burdensome for preparers to implement and users to understand. They recommend that the IASB should consider this burden when assessing the merits of proposed amendments.

In response to the IFRS Foundation's Review of Structure and Effectiveness, the FRC makes the following broad observations.

  • They agree that the IFRS Foundations's current three-tier governance structure remains appropriate, although in their view it is important for the composition of the Monitoring Board to change to reflect both the balance of global financial activity and the adoption of (or commitment to adopt) IFRSs.
  • They consider that the Trustees should provide more direct oversight of both the strategic direction of the IASB's standard setting and its output. In particular, they should work to address the perception that the IASB's standards are too theoretically-based and not focussed on commercial reality by increasing their scrutiny of cost-benefit analyses.
  • They do not agree with the proposed increase in the number of "at large" Trustees, believing that the geographic distribution of Trustees should focus, though not exclusively, on those jurisdictions that apply IFRS or are committed to their adoption.
  • They support the goal of the IFRS Foundation being publicly funded and believe it is a positive step for the Foundation to be working to increase the number of accounting firms contributing to its funding.

The full response to the IASB consultation and the full response to the IFRS Foundation consultation can be found on the FRC website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.