News

FRC Image

FRC comment letter on the IAASB’s Exposure Draft on an auditor's responsibilities relating to 'other information'

29 Jul, 2014

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published its comment letter on the International Audit and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB’s) revised Exposure Draft of International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 720 'The auditor’s responsibilities relating to other information in documents containing or accompanying audited financial statements and the auditor’s report thereon'.

The IAASB issued an Exposure Draft for a revised International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 720 in November 2012.  The revised Exposure Draft responds to significant concerns raised in response to the IAASB's original proposals.

The FRC’s comment letter has been informed by comments received from respondents to its call for comments on the IAASB proposals in May 2014

Overall, conditional on a number of recommendations, the FRC are “very supportive” of the changes proposed in the IAASB’s revised Exposure Draft.

The key comments of the FRC are:

  • That it supports “in principle” the introduction of the new requirements in paragraphs 14 and 15 and the related enhanced application material that clarify the auditor’s responsibilities with respect to other information.  However the FRC suggest a number of improvements to make it clearer as to the extent and nature of the work effort required.
  • That the proposals do not communicate clearly that the auditor’s obligation does not extend to knowledge of matters identified in all other engagements performed by the firm.  In this respect the FRC recommend that the IAASB change the requirement in paragraph 14(b).
  • That the FRC does not agree with the IAASB’s conclusion to require the auditor to read and consider other information only obtained after the date of the auditor’s report, but not to require identification of such other information in the auditor’s report or subsequent reporting on such other information.  The FRC comments that “we believe that considerable benefit would accrue to stakeholders from the identification of such other information” and that it “strongly” suggests that the IAASB enhance the requirements in paragraph 21 “Reporting” in respect of these areas.

Further comments and a full response to all questions raised in the invitation to comment are contained within the full comment letter on the FRC website.

Public Sector Accounting Image

CIPFA/LASAAC consults on new Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting

28 Jul, 2014

The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) and the Local Authority (Scotland) Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) are seeking comments on an exposure draft of the 2015/16 Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the UK (the Code) which would apply to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2015 (“the exposure draft”). CIPFA and LASAAC are also seeking comments on a consultation to simplify and streamline the presentation of local authority financial statements.

Local authorities in the United Kingdom are required to keep their accounts in accordance with ‘proper practices’. They must comply with the terms of the Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the United Kingdom prepared by the CIPFA/LASAAC Local Authority Accounting Code Board (CIPFA/LASAAC).

The exposure draft includes proposals to incorporate the requirements of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement to the measurement of property, plant and equipment in the public sector.  The exposure draft proposes that operational property, plant and equipment should be measured based on the service potential that the assets provide in support of the services of the authority.  The exposure draft proposes that such assets are measured at existing use valuation and where no market is in existence or assets are specialised, measured at depreciated replacement cost.  For these assets, the exposure draft notes that IFRS 13 “will be out of scope” as “these assets will not formally be valued at fair value”.  These measurement bases are the same as within the current 2014/15 Code and hence are not subject to change as part of the consultation.

The exposure draft proposes a change for property, plant and equipment that is not being used to supply goods and services and that do not meet the criteria of assets held for sale (i.e. surplus assets).  It is proposed that these assets are measured at fair value in accordance with IFRS 13 where they are currently measured by an existing use valuation based on their use before coming surplus.  This change will also require IFRS 13 disclosures for such assets.

Other significant amendments proposed in the exposure draft are in relation to:

  • The impact of the Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010 – 2012 and 2011 – 2013 Cycles.
  • The Impact of IFRIC 21 Levies
  • The implications of Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Irelandwith respect to:
    • Value Added Tax –no significant changes.
    • Heritage Assets.  The exposure draft proposes to retain the current valuation methods for heritage assets (i.e. that entities can select the most appropriate and relevant method according to their specific circumstances) and to retain the provision that depreciation need not be provided for heritage assets with indefinite lives.
    • Pension Funds.

A number of other minor and drafting amendments are also proposed.  Comments on the exposure draft are invited until 10 October 2014.

In addition, CIPFA/LASAAC are also consulting on proposals to simplify and streamline the presentation of local authority financial statements/statutory accounts to “better meet the needs of users” and to “remove unnecessary burdens from local authority accounts preparers” (“the consultation”).  The consultation follows an earlier consultation in July 2013 on simplifying and streamlining the presentation of local authority financial statements.  Based on the earlier consultation respondents’ key messages were:

agreement with the consultation that local authority accounts have a tendency to be too long and are often burdened with too much detail

it was difficult to identify traditional local authority measures of performance i.e. movements on General Fund and HRA balances, and

there were a number of challenges to the application of the segmental reporting requirements and some of the reporting requirements of the Service Reporting Code of Practice (SeRCOP).

Following these comments, CIPFA/LASAAC’s consultation focuses on the reporting of local authority performance (i.e. the Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement and the Movement in Reserves Statement).  The consultation also focuses on the segmental reporting requirements specified in the Code and also considers narrative reporting requirements that accompany the financial statements.  The consultation seeks views from “interested parties and is encouraging respondents to be both creative and challenging in their responses”.

Comments on the consultation are invited until 19 September 2014.

Click for (all links to CIPFA website):

IAESB (International Accounting Education Standards Board) (lt gray) Image

IAESB proposes revised framework for International Education Standards

25 Jul, 2014

The International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB) has released for public exposure proposed revisions to its Framework for International Education Standards (IES).

The proposed Framework is split into four sections:

  1. Identification of the purpose and scope.
  2. Explanation of concepts in the IESs.
  3. Description of the nature of the IESs and related IAESB publications.
  4. Role of IFAC members related to the IESs.

The proposal is part of the IAESB’s initiative to improve the relevancy, clarity, and consistency of its standards by redrafting all eight IESs in accordance with its new drafting conventions. To date, IESs 1 to 6, as well as the redrafting of IES 7, have been completed. The IES 8 revision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Comments are requested by 27 October 2014.

For more information, see the press release and the revised framework on the IFAC’s website.

Financial Reporting Lab Image

Financial Reporting Lab publishes project report providing investor insight on accounting policies and integration of related financial information

25 Jul, 2014

The Financial Reporting Lab has published a project report which seeks to provide investor insight on the presentation, position and content of accounting policy disclosures and notes, and their views on the integration of financial information with the primary financial statements (“the project report”). By providing a view of what investors want, the project report also seeks to aid companies when they develop their future reporting in order to better meet the needs of investors.

Both companies (16) and institutional investors (19) took part in the project.  Further input was received from “over 200” retail investors. 

The project report; ‘Accounting policies and integration of related financial information’ is part of the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC’s) programme  of work to support clear and concise reporting; a project which began with the publication of ‘Guidance on the Strategic Report’, in June 2014.

The project report provides a number of observations in the areas of accounting policies, notes to the financial statements and integration of financial review:

Accounting policies

The project report highlights a number of “clear messages” for companies in relation to improving the placement of significant accounting policies and enhancing the quality of their disclosures.  It highlights that institutional investors “consider that policies that are not significant are clutter” and were more concerned with the quality of disclosures rather than their placement. 

The project report notes that investors are “generally happy” for companies to make their own judgements as to what their significant accounting policies are.  However investors identified a number of attributes that, if taken alone or together, may indicate that a significant accounting policy would need to be disclosed:

materiality of transactions classes and amounts, and importance to the nature of the business;

policies for all distinct revenue streams;

where there is choice of policy under IFRS, or significant judgement in selecting the policy; and

where there is need for management to apply significant levels of estimation or judgement in applying the policy. 

The project report also identifies what “good quality” looks like for investors in relation to policy disclosures and highlights that “accounting policy disclosure should be company-specific” and avoid “boiler-plate” disclosures.

Investors identified that policies should:

be written using plain, understandable language;

describe any judgements made in selecting the policy applied, and the rationale for them;

describe the company’s application of accounting policies (not summarise the IFRS standard), including the estimation/judgements made and their significance to reported amounts; and

describe new IFRS requirements only if they significantly, or are likely to significantly, impact the financial statements; and present the impact of changes in tabular format.

Many companies currently disclose additional accounting policies (beyond those that are significant) and the project report indicates that there are “diverse views” among investors with “some” retail investors preferring a complete list of policies to be disclosed in the annual report and others, such as institutional investors, preferring that only significant accounting policies are disclosed.

Notes to the financial statements

The project report highlights that, among other things, consistency of note order across companies and time is “highly valued” by investors.  

Integration of financial review

The project report indicates that most investors “prefer the traditional approach of placing management commentary and financial statement information in separate sections of the annual report”.

A number of examples are provided in the project report of current good practice in these areas.

The press release and the full project report are available from the FRC website. A slide deck summarising the key findings of the report is also available to download from the FRC website.

ASAF (Accounting Standards Advisory Forum) (mid blue) Image

Agenda for the September 2014 ASAF meeting

25 Jul, 2014

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has released the tentative agenda for the meeting of the Accounting Standards Advisory Forum (ASAF), which is to be held at the IASB's offices in London on 25-26 September 2014. The meeting will discuss a number of the IASB's active projects, including the disclosure initiative, the conceptual framework, and liabilities/equity.

The agenda for the meeting (as at 25 September 2014*) is summarised below:

Thursday, 25 September 2014 (10:15-17:45)

  • Leases
  • Discount rates
  • Post-implementation review IFRS 3
  • Conceptual framework
  • Disclosure initiative - principles of disclosure, IAS 1 amendments


Friday, 26 September 2014 (09:00-15:00)

  • Insurance
  • Disclosure initiative - materiality (including significant accounting policies)
  • Equity/Liabilities
  • IASB project update and agenda planning
  • Debrief

* Note: The agenda for the meeting was originally released on 24 July 2014, revised on 12 August 2014, and revised again on 25 September 2014.  The agenda shown is a summary of the final agenda dated 25 September 2014.  Changes made between the initial and final agenda including moving items between days, and removing an agenda topic on inflation accounting. 

Agenda papers for the meeting will be made available on the IASB's website in due course.

EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) (dk green) Image

EFRAG issues two final endorsement advices and effects study reports on the amendments to IFRS 11 and IAS 16/IAS 38

25 Jul, 2014

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has submitted to the European Commission its endorsement advice letter and effects study report on the amendments to IFRS 11 regarding the acquisitions of interests in joint operations and the amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38 on acceptable methods of depreciation and amortisation.

In both cases, the EFRAG supports the adoption of the amendments and recommends that the European Commission endorses the amendments because it believes implementation that the benefits for preparers and users implementing the amendments outweigh the costs.

Concurrently, EFRAG has updated its report showing the status of endorsement to reflect the final EFRAG endorsement advices.

Click for the following information on the EFRAG website:

Amendments to IFRS 11Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38
IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) (blue) Image

IASB work plan update for July 2014

24 Jul, 2014

Following the issuance of IFRS 9 'Financial instruments', the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has updated its work plan. In the updated work plan, the completed projects on impairment and limited reconsideration of IFRS 9 have been removed.

 

Current status

The revised time table for the major projects is now as follows:

Project Current status Next project step Expected timing

Conceptual Framework — Comprehensive IASB project

Redeliberations

Exposure draft

Q4 2014

Financial instruments — Macro hedge accounting

Discussion paper

Public consultation

Q2 and Q3 2014

Insurance contracts

Re-exposure

Redeliberations

Q2 2014

Leases

Re-exposure

Redeliberations

Q2 2014

Disclosure initiative — Amendments to IAS 1

Exposure draft

Redeliberations

Q3 2014

Disclosure initiative — Reconciliation of liabilities from financing activities

Redeliberations

Exposure draft

Q4 2014

Click for the IASB work plan dated 24 July 2014 (link to IASB website). We have updated our project pages to reflect the updated work plan and other known developments.

Auditing Image
European Union (old) Image

CMA consults on draft Order for audit reform in the UK

24 Jul, 2014

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has issued a consultation on a draft Order seeking to implement aspects of the Competition Commission’s package of remedies for audit reform in the UK in light of agreement at European level on audit reform.

In October 2013, the Competition Commission (the predecessor of the CMA) announced a final package of remedies to increase competition within the provision of statutory audit services to FTSE 350 companies in the UK.  Among other things, the proposals required that all FTSE 350 companies put their statutory audit engagement out to tender at least every ten years. 

Subsequent to the release of the Competition Commission proposals members of the Council of Ministers adopted a new framework for EU audit reform in the form of a Directive amending the Statutory Audit Directive (Directive 2006/43/EC) (link to Europa website) and a Regulation on specific requirements regarding the statutory audit of public-interest entities (PIEs).  

In light of the EU rules, which the UK must adopt by 2016, the Competition Commission announced that it would review its draft Orders to consider the implications that the EU legislation would have.

The draft Order ‘The Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation (Mandatory use of competitive tender processes and Audit Committee responsibilities) Order 2014’ (“the draft Order”), published for consultation today, seeks to put into force some of the changes proposed by the Competition Commission including requiring that FTSE 350 companies put their statutory audit out to tender at least every ten years.  The draft Order proposes that if a FTSE 350 company has not retendered within five years, the Audit Committee must, in the Audit Committee Report covering the fifth financial year, state the financial year in which it intends to complete a competitive tender process and why this period is in the best interests of the members.  This process must be repeated in consecutive years until retendering is required in the tenth year.  The draft Order also implements measures designed to strengthen the influence of the company’s Audit Committee over the provision of audit services.

The CMA has announced that they do not plan to make an order implementing the Competition Commission’s original proposal regarding auditor clauses in loan arrangements.  EU legislation will, from 17 June 2017, prohibit the use of restrictive clauses in contracts which limit a company’s choice of auditor “in order to promote market diversity” and the CMA considers that the EU measures “are more extensive than its proposed remedy…..and therefore sufficiently address concerns identified in its report in this regard”.

In its Plan and Budget, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) announced that it would address the consequences of the Competition Commission’s other proposed remedies including introduction of a programme to review FTSE 350 audits on average every five years, increased reporting of the work of the Audit Quality Review, and a change to the UK Corporate Governance Code to require an advisory vote on the Audit Committee Report.

Comments on the draft Order are invited in writing until 24 August 2014.

Click for:

EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) (dk green) Image

Updated EFRAG endorsement status report for the issuance of IFRS 9

24 Jul, 2014

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has updated its Endorsement Status Report to include IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' published on 24 July 2014.

The Standard supersedes all previous versions of IFRS 9 and is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. The updated report does not indicate when a final endorsement of the standard can be expected.

The endorsement status report, dated 24 July 2014, is available here.

IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) (blue) Image

IASB publishes final version of IFRS 9

24 Jul, 2014

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published the final version of IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' bringing together the classification and measurement, impairment and hedge accounting phases of the IASB's project to replace IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'. This version adds a new expected loss impairment model and limited amendments to classification and measurement for financial assets. The Standard supersedes all previous versions of IFRS 9 and is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.

 

Background

The IASB has had the project to replace IAS 39 on its active agenda since 2008 and has undertaken the project in phases. The IASB first issued IFRS 9 in 2009 with a new classification and measurement model for financial assets followed by requirements for financial liabilities and derecognition added in 2010. Subsequently, IFRS 9 was amended in 2013 to add the new general hedge accounting requirements.

This final version of IFRS 9 adds a new expected loss impairment model and amends the classification and measurement model for financial assets by adding a new fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI) category for certain debt instruments and additional guidance on how to apply the business model and contractual cash flow characteristics test.

 

Summary of key requirements


Expected loss impairment model

The impairment model in IFRS 9 is based on the concept of providing for expected losses at inception of a contract, except in the case of purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets, where expected credit losses are incorporated into the effective interest rate.

Scope

The impairment requirements of IFRS 9 apply to:

  • Financial assets measured at amortised cost;
  • Financial assets mandatorily measured at FVTOCI (see below);
  • Loan commitments when there is a present obligation to extend credit (except where these are measured at FVTPL);
  • Financial guarantee contracts to which IFRS 9 is applied (except those measured at FVTPL);
  • Lease receivables within the scope of IAS 17 Leases; and
  • Contract assets within the scope of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (i.e. rights to consideration following transfer of goods or services).

General Approach

With the exception of purchased or originated credit impaired financial assets (see below), expected credit losses are required to be measured through a loss allowance at an amount equal to:

  • the 12-month expected credit losses (expected credit losses that result from those default events on the financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date); or
  • full lifetime expected credit losses (expected credit losses that result from all possible default events over the life of the financial instrument).

A loss allowance for full lifetime expected credit losses is required for a financial instrument if the credit risk of that financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, as well as to contract assets or trade receivables that do not constitute a financing transaction in accordance with IFRS 15.

Additionally, entities can elect an accounting policy to recognise full lifetime expected losses for all contract assets and/or all trade receivables that do constitute a financing transaction in accordance with IFRS 15. The same election is also separately permitted for lease receivables.

For all other financial instruments, expected credit losses are measured at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses.

Significant increase in credit risk

With the exception of purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets (see below), the loss allowance for financial instruments is measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected losses if the credit risk of a financial instrument has increased significantly since initial recognition, unless the credit risk of the financial instrument is low (e.g. investment grade) at the reporting date in which case it can be assumed that credit risk on the financial instrument has not increased significantly since initial recognition.

The assessment of whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk is based on an increase in the probability of a default occurring since initial recognition.

The requirements also contain a rebuttable presumption that the credit risk has increased significantly when contractual payments are more than 30 days past due. IFRS 9 also requires that (other than for purchased or originated credit impaired financial instruments) if a significant increase in credit risk that had taken place since initial recognition and has reversed by a subsequent reporting period (i.e., cumulatively credit risk is not significantly higher than at initial recognition) then the expected credit losses on the financial instrument revert to being measured based on an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses. [IFRS 9 paragraph 5.5.11]

Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets

Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets are treated differently because the asset is credit-impaired at initial recognition. For these assets, the estimated cash flows used to calculate the (credit-adjusted) effective interest rate at initial recognition incorporate lifetime expected credit losses. Subsequently, any changes in expected losses are recognised as a loss allowance with a corresponding gain or loss recognised in profit or loss.

Credit-impaired financial asset

Under IFRS 9, a "financial asset is credit-impaired when one or more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future cash flows of that financial asset have occurred. Evidence that a financial asset is credit-impaired include[s] observable data about the following events:

(a) significant financial difficulty of the issuer or the borrower;

(b) a breach of contract, such as a default or past due event;

(c) the lender(s) of the borrower, for economic or contractual reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty, having granted to the borrower a concession(s) that the lender(s) would not otherwise consider;

(d) it is becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation;

(e) the disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties; or

(f) the purchase or origination of a financial asset at a deep discount that reflects the incurred credit losses.”

Basis for estimating expected credit losses

Any measurement of expected credit losses under IFRS 9 shall reflect an unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined by evaluating the range of possible outcomes as well as incorporating the time value of money. Also, the entity should consider reasonable and supportable information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when measuring expected credit losses.

To reflect time value, expected losses should be discounted to the reporting date using the effective interest rate of the asset (or an approximation thereof) that was determined at initial recognition. A “credit-adjusted effective interest” rate should be used for expected credit losses of purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets.  In contrast to the “effective interest rate” (calculated using expected cash flows that ignore expected credit losses), the credit-adjusted effective interest rate reflects expected credit losses of the financial asset.

Presentation

Whilst interest revenue is always required to be presented as a separate line item, it is calculated differently according to the status of the asset with regard to credit impairment. In the case of a financial asset that is not a purchased or originated credit-impaired financial asset and for which there is no objective evidence of impairment at the reporting date, interest revenue is calculated by applying the effective interest rate method to the gross carrying amount.

In the case of a financial asset that is not a purchased or originated credit-impaired financial asset but subsequently has become credit-impaired, interest revenue is calculated by applying the effective interest rate to the amortised cost balance, which comprises the gross carrying amount adjusted for any loss allowance.

In the case of purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets, interest revenue is always recognised by applying the credit-adjusted effective interest rate to the amortised cost carrying amount.

 

Limited amendments to classification and measurement of financial assets

Fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI) category

The final version of IFRS 9 introduces a new classification and measurement category of FVTOCI for debt instruments that meet the following two conditions:

  • Business model test: The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.
  • Cash flow characteristics test: The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.

When an asset meets both of these conditions it is required to be measured at FVTOCI unless, on initial recognition, it is designated at fair value through profit or loss to address an accounting mismatch.

For such assets, interest revenue, foreign exchange gains and losses and impairment gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss with other gains or losses (i.e., the difference between those items and the total change in fair value) recognised in other comprehensive income (OCI). Any cumulative gain or loss recorded in OCI would be reclassified to profit and loss on derecognition or dealt with in accordance with specific guidance in the case of reclassifications.

Interest income and impairment gains and losses are recognised and measured in the same manner as for assets measured at amortised cost such that the amounts in OCI represents the difference between the amortised cost value and fair value. This results in the same information in profit of loss as if the asset was measured at amortised cost, yet the statement of financial position reflects the instrument’s fair value.

Additional guidance

The final Standard also adds guidance on how to determine whether financial assets are held under a business model that is ‘hold to collect’ or ‘hold to collect and sell’ with examples and explanations of the types and levels of sales that are acceptable for such business models.

In addition to guidance on the business model test, the Standard adds guidance on the contractual cash flow characteristics test to clarify that in basic lending arrangements the most significant elements of interest are consideration for the time value of money and credit risk. If the time value of money element is modified (e.g. interest rate resets every month to a one-year rate), an entity is required to assess the modified element against new criteria introduced by the amendment.

The application guidance also introduces an additional exception that allows certain additional prepayment features to meet the contractual cash flow characteristics requirements to qualify for amortised cost or FVTOCI measurement.

 

Effective date

The Standard has a mandatory effective date for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, with earlier application permitted (subject to local endorsement requirements). The Standard is applied retrospectively with some exceptions (for example most of the hedge accounting requirements apply prospectively) but entities need not restate prior periods in relation to classification and measurement (including impairment).

The final version of IFRS 9 supersedes all previous versions of the Standard. However, for annual periods beginning before 1 January 2018, an entity may elect to apply those earlier versions of IFRS 9 if the entity’s relevant date of initial application is before 1 February 2015.

 

Additional information

IASB website

IAS Plus

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.