The release of the two additional exposure drafts follows on from an earlier exposure draft outlining the G4 project development process and the proposed significant changes to the current 'G3' guidelines.  The two topics covered by the new exposure drafts were signalled in the original draft.

Proposed new guidance on anti-corruption is designed to enable companies to report information on their policy, their publicly stated commitment to zero tolerance of corruption, their training of employees, governance bodies and business partners on anti-corruption, and their collective action initiatives towards combating corruption.

The exposure draft on GHG proposes new content for the G4 guidelines that are designed to more closely align GRI’s guidance with the GHG Protocol set of standards, jointly released by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and the ISO 14064 standard produced by the International Standards Organization for Standardization.

Comments on the two new exposure drafts close on 12 November 2012.  Click for press release (link to GRI website).

The report, entitled Does the SEC have the will to find a way towards IFRS? notes that the final report is "comprehensive and organized" around a number of key themes, such as the costs and obstacles issuers would face in making a change from US GAAP to IFRS and the degree to which existing US GAAP is entrenched in U.S. regulatory regimes.

However, the report opines that "observations on investor preparedness, regulatory impact, issuer impacts, and human capital readiness offer commentary on the current state of affairs which, in our view, will evolve once a decision to adopt IFRS is made".  The report later concludes that in the CFA Institute's view "readers of the Final Report are left with data and observations but without an indication of how they will be weighed and evaluated".  The report laments the lack of analysis of whether IFRS is 'so sufficiently flawed' as not to be interests of investors, what exact modifications to IFRS would be needed to incorporate it into the US reporting regime, and whether issues of lack of comparability in IFRS is a greater obstacle than exists with multiple accounting languages.

The report outlines a number of analytical or evaluative questions that the SEC staff report does not answer, such as:

• Which of the dimensions of the SEC IFRS Work Plan are most critical to a recommendation?
• Which, if any, of the challenges are considered to be insurmountable and why?
• What, if any, actions can or should be taken (and by whom) to address the challenges or obstacles, and over what time period?
• To what degree should 'regulatory capture' of U.S. GAAP serve as an obstacle or deterrent to adopting accounting standards which are meant to serve investors rather than regulators?

The report concludes with the following observation:

Requiring most immediate attention, the Final Report leaves stakeholders wondering: What are the SEC’s next steps? Will there be a recommendation and what might be its timing? We believe it is imperative for the SEC to define the way forward, as failure to act or provide clear direction is, in substance, a decision not to incorporate IFRS. Rather than continued evaluation and delay, we believe investors would prefer the SEC to provide a path forward with an affirmative or negative decision.

Click for access to the CFA Institute report (link to CFA Institute website).

Additional resources related to the SEC report:

• SEC report on work plan for IFRSs
• SEC staff report on IFRS — summary and reactions
• IFRS Foundation Trustees respond to SEC staff IFRS report

The ACCA's report, presented as a discussion paper entitled Reporting pre- and post-King III: what’s the difference?, summarises the findings of a full academic report called Integrated reporting: the new face of social, ethical and environmental reporting in South Africa? written for the ACCA by Jill Solomon (King’s College London) and Warren Maroun (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg).

Integrated reporting has been mandatory for entities listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange in South Africa since 2010-11.  The research analysed the corporate reports of ten major South African companies, including a number of resources companies,  immediately before (2009) and after (2010–11) the introduction of mandatory integrated reporting.

Some of the findings of the research included:

• Integrated reporting sees significantly more social, environmental and ethical information included in corporate reports, and in more places throughout the report - although this sometimes leads to repetition which is seen as a significant weakness
• The impact of integrated reporting on the way that social, environmental and ethical information is disclosed can be characterised by the following themes: the crucial importance of materiality; an evolving discourse of risk and risk management; an increasing tendency towards quantification; the emergence of new reporting items; the emergence of new sections in the reports; and the increasing integration of social, environmental and ethical considerations into corporate governance structures
• Companies have shifted from reporting that is aimed exclusively at their shareholders to reporting that expounds the directors’ claimed belief in stakeholder accountability and stakeholder engagement.

ACCA’s analysis offers five recommendations for the development of integrated reporting, based on the academic’s findings:

1. The way in which information is set out could be more concise to avoid repetition
2. The form of reporting could be extended to incorporate more feedback from consultation with stakeholders regarding social and environmental issues and corporate responsiveness to feedback
3. Organisations should solicit the views of their major stakeholders about the social, environmental and ethical information (and underlying policies and practices) that they report and include these views within integrated reports
4. Academics can and should play a significant role in researching the integrated reporting framework and its applicability
5. Academics should, can and do play an important role in educating potential managers and users in integrated reporting through university and professional education in which they are involved.

Click for more information (link to ACCA website).

The formula linkbase can be used with software packages supporting the XBRL formula specification 1.0 and allows for additional validations of the reported facts. Developed in a generic manner, the IFRS Formula Linkbase 2012 can be used directly on the filings created, based on the IFRS Taxonomy (instance documents) or the company specific extensions to the IFRS Taxonomy (filer extension taxonomy and instance document). Guidance documentation for the formula linkbase is also available.

Technical changes in the 2012 version include (1) positive and negative formula validation is placed in separate files, (2) redundant members in the filter for the Dimension aggregation formulae are removed and (3) precondition expressions in the validation are  simplified (earnings per share formulae).

Click for the press release to access the Formula Linkbase 2012 on the IASB's website.

The report, entitled The value of extra-financial disclosure - What investors and analysts said is the result of a survey commissioned by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and The Prince’s Accounting for Sustainability Project (A4S), and conducted by Radley Yeldar.  The survey involved a relatively small sample of investors and analysts but is considered "a useful snapshot of investor and analyst sentiment towards extra-financial disclosure at the present time".

Some of the findings from the survey included:

• Over 80% of the research sample believe that extra-financial information is very relevant or relevant to their investment decision‑making or analysis
• Investors and analysts use multiple sources to gather relevant financial and extra-financial information but show a strong preference for sources which are more comprehensive and specialised - with direct engagement with Board level representatives, followed by formal reporting channels such as the sustainability report, annual report or integrated report are most influential
• Over 80% of investors and analysts surveyed  believe that integrated reporting will deliver benefits to their analysis and company assessments - seeing integrated reporting as useful or very useful for increasing the reliability, accessibility, relevance and comparability of extra-financial information, as well as improving assessments of future company performance
• A majority of respondents were not familiar with eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), with less than 10% of those surveyed indicating they use XBRL and that it affects how they receive financial information.

Click for more information (link to GRI website).

The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, the body responsible for the governance and oversight of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), discussed the following topics:

• Report of the Chairman of the IASB concerning the four main Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and convergence projects as well as the progress the IASB was making in determining its future agenda.
• Report of the Chairman of the IFRS Advisory Council on the issues discussed at the June 2012 meeting of the Council and the draft Due Process Handbook.
• Report of the Chairman of the Due Process Oversight Committee on initial feedback received on the draft Due Process Handbook, which is being exposed for public comment, and on the comprehensive review of the IFRS for SMEs.
• Update on the IFRS for SMEs
• Regional outreach activity on whether and how to incorporate IFRSs into the US financial reporting regime.
• Meeting with the IFRS Foundation Monitoring Board regarding the progress made in following up the recommendations of their respective reviews of the governance and strategy of the organisation.

Please click for the full summary on the IASB's website. The next meeting of the Trustees of the IFRS Foundation is scheduled for 12 October 2012.

You can also access the preliminary and unofficial notes taken by Deloitte observers for this meeting.

The IVSC had previously issued a Guidance Note, GN 12 The Valuation of Trade Related Property and had issued an exposure draft which proposed to update and reissue the guidance as part of its revamped valuation standards, which were ultimately issued in July 2011.

However,  the IVSC chose not to finalise the valuation standard on this topic because there were questions whether sufficient guidance on trade related property was already included in other valuation standards, a perceived confusion of a real property interest with a business, and the need to consider the need for specific valuation guidance of this type.

The discussion paper seeks constituent input as to whether it is practical and necessary to define a distinct category of real property for valuation purposes based on the degree to which the buildings or any other structures are specialised, and explores various issues in undertaking such a valuation.

The IVSC is seeking comments on the Discussion Paper by 31 October 2012.  Click for:

• IVSC press release (link to IVSC website)
• IVSC Discussion Paper The Valuation of Trade Related Property (link to IVSC website).

Each update lasts no more than an hour, and sessions are normally held three times a year, approximately at the end of March, July, and November. We intend to make a recording of each session available on IAS Plus for a period of at least four months from the date of the presentation.

The following topics were covered in the July 2012 webcast:

• Latest IFRS developments
• Other UK reporting developments
• Eurozone uncertainties
• The future for financial instruments

To access the recording click here.

The PIR process conducted by the FAF is independent of the standard-setting process of the FASB.  This differs from the PIR process for IFRSs where only the IASB conducts the PIR; there is no independent reviewing organisation.

The IASB expects to begin its PIR on business combinations (IFRS 3) later this year. The IASB and FASB worked together in developing their business combination standards as part of their convergence efforts. However, it is unclear at this time the extent to which the IASB and the FASB will coordinate their PIR processes.

More information on the FAF post-implementation review of Statement 141R is available on the FAF website.