This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

News

FASB XBRL Image

FASB proposes taxonomy improvements for proposed ASUs

Feb 23, 2018

The FASB has issued for comment proposed taxonomy improvement documents related to (1) leases and (2) benchmark interest rates for hedge accounting.

The proposed taxonomy improvements related to the proposed ASU, Leases (Topic 842) — Targeted Improvements, would introduce four new elements and eight reference additions. Comments on these taxonomy improvements are due by April 7, 2018.

The proposed taxonomy improvements related to the proposed ASU, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate Based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes, would introduce two new elements and modify two labels. Comments on these taxonomy improvements are due by April 22, 2018.

In its related action alert, the FASB noted a change in how taxonomy improvements will be issued:

Effective January 1, 2018, proposed Taxonomy improvements for proposed Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) will have a formal comment period concurrent with the issuance of the proposed ASU. The past practice of an annual 60-day comment period on the entire Taxonomy in the September-October timeframe is hereafter replaced by comment periods for the individual proposed Taxonomy improvements; however, the FASB Taxonomy Online Review and Comment System (TORCS) is operational throughout the year.

SEC (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Image

SEC extends compliance date for open-end fund liquidity classification

Feb 23, 2018

The SEC has voted to extend by six months the deadline for open-end funds to comply with certain elements of the SEC’s liquidity management program rule.

The SEC issued Final Rule 33-10233, Investment Company Liquidity Risk Management Programs, in October 2016. The SEC decided to extend the compliance date to give open-end funds more time to implement the rule’s classification requirement. The new compliance dates are as follows:

[T]he compliance date for implementation of the classification and classification-related elements of the liquidity rule is June 1, 2019, for larger fund groups, and Dec. 1, 2019, for smaller fund groups. The other requirements will go into effect as originally scheduled: Dec. 1, 2018, for larger fund groups, and June 1, 2019, for smaller fund groups.

For more information, see the press release and updated FAQ document on the SEC’s Web site.

SEC document Image

SEC issues interpretive guidance on cybersecurity

Feb 21, 2018

The SEC has issued an interpretation, “Commission Statement and Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures.”

The interpretation assists “public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents” and outlines the SEC’s views on “cybersecurity disclosure requirements under the federal securities laws as they apply to public operating companies.” This Commission guidance reinforces and further builds on the Division of Corporation Finance (CF) principles-based guidance on cybersecurity issued in 2011 (CF Disclosure Guidance: Topic No. 2). In addition, it addresses the importance of cybersecurity disclosure controls and procedures and the application of insider trading prohibitions, and Regulation FD and selective disclosure prohibitions in the cybersecurity context.

The interpretation will become effective on the date of its publication in the Federal Register.

For more information, see the press release and interpretation on the SEC’s Web site.

FASB document Image

FASB proposes to expand the list of benchmark interest rates for hedge accounting

Feb 20, 2018

The FASB has issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), “Inclusion of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate Based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.”

The proposed ASU would amend ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to “add the OIS rate based on SOFR as a fifth U.S. benchmark interest rate to help companies and other organizations avoid the potential cost and complexity associated with using different cash flows and discount rates to measure the hedged item and the hedging instrument.” Currently, the four eligible benchmark interest rates under ASC 815 are:

  • Interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government.
  • The London Interbank Offered Rate swap rate.
  • The Overnight Index Swap Rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate.
  • The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association municipal swap rate.

Comments on the proposed ASU are due by March 30, 2018. For more information, see the press release and proposed ASU on the FASB’s Web site.

FASB meeting Image

Highlights of the FASB’s February 14 meeting

Feb 16, 2018

At its February 14, 2018, meeting, the FASB discussed its projects on (1) hedging implementation, (2) revenue recognition of grants and contracts by not-for-profit entities, and (3) defined benefit plans.

Financial instruments — hedging implementation

The Board discussed implementation issues related to ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, including questions it has received about the definition of the term “prepayable instruments” and net investment hedges. The Board directed its staff to research a potential technical correction related to the use of the term “prepayable.”

For more information, see Deloitte's related journal entry as well as the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Revenue recognition of grants and contracts by not-for-profit entities

The Board redeliberated its August 2017 proposed ASU, Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made, and made decisions related to:

  • Conditional contributions — indicators to describe a barrier.
  • Contributions made by a resource provider.
  • Recurring disclosures by recipients about conditional promises to give.
  • Simultaneous release of a condition and a restriction.
  • Transition.
  • Effective date and early adoption.

For more information, see the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Disclosure framework — disclosure review: defined benefit plans

The Board discussed feedback received on its January 2016 proposed ASU, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The Board made decisions related to adding, removing, amending, and retaining certain disclosures.

For more information, see Deloitte's related journal entry as well as the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

SEC (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Image

SEC names new chief accountant in the Division of Corporation Finance

Feb 16, 2018

The SEC has announced that Kyle Moffatt has been named as chief accountant in the Division of Corporation Finance to replace Mark Kronforst.

Mr. Moffatt has served as acting chief accountant since January 2018 and has worked in the Division since 2000.

For more information, see the press release on the SEC’s Web site.

FASB document Image

FASB issues ASU on income tax accounting related to new tax reform law

Feb 15, 2018

The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.”

The ASU amends ASC 220, Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income, to “allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.” In addition, under the ASU, an entity will be required to provide certain disclosures regarding stranded tax effects.

The ASU is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. For more information, see the ASU and press release on the FASB’s Web site.

SEC (US Securities and Exchange Commission) Image

SEC announces share class selection disclosure initiative

Feb 13, 2018

The SEC’s Division of Enforcement has announced its share class selection disclosure initiative.

The purpose of the initiative is “to protect advisory clients from undisclosed conflicts of interest and return money to investors.” Specifically, under the initiative, “the Division will agree not to recommend financial penalties against investment advisers who self-report violations of the federal securities laws relating to certain mutual fund share class selection issues and promptly return money to harmed clients.”

FASB meeting Image

Highlights of the FASB’s February 7 meeting

Feb 09, 2018

At its February 7, 2018, meeting, the FASB discussed (1) reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income, (2) collaborative arrangements, (3) disclosure requirements related to fair value measurement, (4) cloud computing arrangements, and (5) segment reporting.

Reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income

The Board discussed feedback received on its proposed ASU Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and tentatively decided to permit, but not require, entities to reclassify stranded tax effects related to the application of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The FASB directed its staff to draft a final ASU for a vote by written ballot. The ASU is expected to be issued no later than February 16, 2018.

For more in­for­ma­tion, see the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Collaborative arrangements — targeted improvements

The Board tentatively decided to (1) retain the scope of the project, (2) require entities to apply the amendments by using a retrospective approach, and (3) not require additional recurring disclosures. In addition, the Board directed its staff to draft a proposed ASU for a vote by written ballot.

For more in­for­ma­tion, see the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Disclosure framework: disclosure review — fair value measurement

The Board continued deliberating its proposed ASU Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement and made tentative decisions related to disclosures of Level 3 rollforwards, changes in unrealized gains and losses, and measurement uncertainty.

For more in­for­ma­tion, see the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Cloud computing — ratification of EITF consensus-for-exposure

The Board ratified the EITF’s consensus-for-exposure on Issue No. 17-A, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation, Setup, and Other Upfront Costs (Implementation Costs) Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is Considered a Service Contract,” and directed the staff to draft a proposed ASU for a vote by written ballot.

For more in­for­ma­tion, see Deloitte’s January 2018 EITF Snapshot as well as the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

Segment re­port­ing

The Board discussed alternatives for simplifying the segment aggregation criteria and disclosure requirements. For more in­for­ma­tion, see the meeting minutes on the FASB’s Web site.

IASB document Image

IASB finalizes amendments to IAS 19 regarding plan amendments, curtailments, and settlements

Feb 07, 2018

The IASB has issued “Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement — amendments to IAS 19.”

The amend­ments include the following:

  • If a plan amendment, cur­tail­ment, or set­tle­ment occurs, it is now mandatory that the current service cost and the net interest for the period after the re­mea­sure­ment are de­ter­mined by using the as­sump­tions employed for the re­mea­sure­ment.
  • Clarification of the effect of a plan amendment, cur­tail­ment, or set­tle­ment on the re­quire­ments related to the asset ceiling.

The amend­ments apply to plan amend­ments, cur­tail­ments, or set­tle­ments occurring on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins on or after January 1, 2019. Early ap­pli­ca­tion is permitted but must be disclosed.

For more information, see the press release on the IASB's Web site as well as the related IAS Plus project page.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.