This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

CFA Institute critiques SEC IFRS report

  • SEC2 Image

Aug 11, 2012

The Chartered Financial Analysts Institute (CFA Institute) has published a brief summary of issues arising from the SEC staff report on the possible incorporation of IFRSs into the U.S. financial reporting system. The summary provides a critique of the report, pointing out a number of areas where the CFA Institute believes more analysis and evaluation are required.

The report, Does the SEC have the will to find a way towards IFRS? notes that the final report is "comprehensive and organized" around a number of key themes, such as the costs and obstacles issuers would face in making a change from U.S. GAAP to IFRSs and the degree to which existing U.S. GAAP is entrenched in U.S. regulatory regimes.

However, the report opines that "observations on investor preparedness, regulatory impact, issuer impacts, and human capital readiness offer commentary on the current state of affairs which, in our view, will evolve once a decision to adopt IFRS is made." The report concludes that in the CFA Institute's view "readers of the Final Report are left with data and observations but without an indication of how they will be weighed and evaluated." The report laments the lack of analysis of whether IFRSs is "so sufficiently flawed" that it is not in the interests of investors. The report discusses what exact modifications to IFRSs would be needed to incorporate them into the U.S. reporting regime and whether issues of lack of comparability in IFRSs is a greater obstacle than exists with multiple accounting languages.

The report outlines a number of analytical or evaluative questions that the SEC staff report does not answer, such as:

  • Which of the dimensions of the SEC IFRS Work Plan are most critical to a recommendation?
  • Which, if any, of the challenges are considered to be insurmountable and why?
  • What, if any, actions can or should be taken (and by whom) to address the challenges or obstacles, and over what time period?
  • To what degree should "regulatory capture" of U.S. GAAP serve as an obstacle or deterrent to adopting accounting standards that are meant to serve investors rather than regulators?

The report concludes with the following observation:

Requiring most immediate attention, the Final Report leaves stakeholders wondering: What are the SEC’s next steps? Will there be a recommendation and what might be its timing? We believe it is imperative for the SEC to define the way forward, as failure to act or provide clear direction is, in substance, a decision not to incorporate IFRS. Rather than continued evaluation and delay, we believe investors would prefer the SEC to provide a path forward with an affirmative or negative decision.

Click for access to the CFA Institute report (link to the CFA Institute's Web site).

Additional resources related to the SEC report:

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.