This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Report on the June 2014 IFRS Advisory Council meeting

  • IFRS Advisory Council (mid blue) Image

Jul 01, 2014

A report on the IFRS Advisory Council meeting, which was held in London on June 9–10, 2014, has been posted to the IASB's Web site. The meeting included the updates on the activities of the Council, IFRS Foundation, IASB and Effect Analysis Consultative Group, as well as discussions focused on the role of judgement in financial reporting, the preliminary feedback on the post-implementation review of IFRS 3, the Conceptual Framework project, and the proposed approach to implementation support groups. A number of other topics were also discussed.

Highlights of the meeting include:

  • Role of judgement.  There was strong support for principles-based accounting. The most members also felt that the use of judgement should be expected and that the IASB should consider this when developing its principles. Also, many members believed that the IASB should not include anti-abuse precautions in its Standards.  
  • Conceptual framework.  There was support by the members for the decisions made on the scope, purpose, and status this project, including its the proposed timeline; however, some noted that significant issues should not be rushed for the sake of meeting this timeline. The members also noted that the IASB should carefully examine the relationship between the Conceptual Framework and its Standards. In addition, the members expressed concerns with the reintroduction of prudence and warned against it conflicting with neutrality.
  • Implementation support groups. There was support for the use of implementation groups; however, certain provisions should be considered. These provisions included: (1) any future group should be considered on a case-by-case basis and whether it is necessary at all and (2) transparency is needed on the group's activities. In addition, the members asked for an evaluation of the implementation groups for revenue and impairments to occur in order to determine their effectiveness.
  • Terms of reference. There were recommendations to revise the Council’s secondary objective to clear up any misconceptions regarding its independence and objectivity.

The next meeting of the IFRS Advisory Council is scheduled for October 13–14, 2014, in London.

The full report on the IFRS Advisory Council meeting is available on the IASB's Web site.

Related Topics

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.