This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Heads Up — FASB proposes to ease transition to the credit losses standard

Published on: Feb 11, 2019

Download PDF
Volume 26, Issue 1

by Stephen McKinney, Deloitte & Touche LLP

On February 6, 2019, the FASB issued a proposed ASU1 that would allow entities to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU 2016-13,2 the fair value option for financial instruments that were previously recorded at amortized cost (except for held-to-maturity debt securities) and that are within the scope of ASC 326-20,3 provided that the instruments are eligible for the fair value option under ASC 825-10.4 This election would be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Comments on the proposed ASU are due by March 8, 2019.

Since the issuance of ASU 2016-13, the FASB has received agenda requests to provide transition relief by allowing entities to elect the fair value option for certain financial instruments. Stakeholders noted that, among other things, an entity may elect the fair value option under ASC 825-10 for newly originated or purchased assets after adopting ASU 2016-13. As a result, some assets may be measured at fair value while others may continue to be measured at amortized cost. Stakeholders believe that this inconsistency would be eliminated if an entity were provided with a one-time election to measure existing assets at fair value upon adopting ASU 2016-13.

For first-time adopters of ASU 2016-13, the election of the fair value option would take place on adoption and entities would apply a modified retrospective approach in which the cumulative effect of the election would be recorded in beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. For entities that have already adopted ASU 2016-13, the FASB will determine the effective date after considering feedback received on the proposed ASU.

____________________

1 FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU), Targeted Transition Relief for Topic 326, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses.

2 FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.

3 FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses: Measured at Amortized Cost.

4 FASB Accounting Standards Codification Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments: Overall.

Download

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.