This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Financial Instruments

Date recorded:

It was noted that EFRAG had responded positively to the IASB's request that IFRS constituents respond to the FASB's exposure draft on financial instruments. The EFRAG response had 'very clearly rejected' the FASB's model and expressed support for the fundamental approach in IFRS 9.

Various aspects of the IASB's project were discussed. The key messages were:

  • EFRAG encouraged the IASB to revisit the amortised cost/ fair value dividing line as it redeliberates the expected loss model
  • EFRAG prefers a frozen credit spread
  • The IASB suggested that the final package on impairment may be expressed differently but would achieve equivalent outcomes
  • It was suggested the IASB and the FASB could explain better what the expected loss model is intended to capture, i.e., the best information available today, not expectations about conditions in the future
  • The Hedging chapter ED is expected in the fourth quarter of 2010. The model being explored is a more fundamental re-think than the FASB's proposals. It would concentrate on the economics and rationale underlying hedging activities. Some current requirements would remain (designation and documentation), but 'bright lines' would be removed.


Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.