This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

IFRS 9/ IAS 39 — Derecognition of modified financial assets

Date recorded:

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement — Derecognition of modified financial assets - Comment Letter Analysis and Finalisation of Agenda Decision – Agenda paper 9


In November 2015, the IFRS Interpretations discussed whether it should progress it’s consideration of a potential project to clarify the requirements in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement regarding when a modification or exchange of a financial asset results in the original asset being derecognised. The Interpretations Committee tentatively decided not to take the issue into its agenda given the broad nature of the issue.

The purpose of this session was to provide an analysis of the comment letters received and discuss the staff recommendation.

Comment letters analysis

The staff indicated that most respondents agreed that the issue was too broad to be resolved through an Interpretation; however, the majority of respondents indicated that the Board should address this issue. The reasons provided were that (i) neither IAS 39 nor IFRS 9 included requirements that were sufficient regarding the modification of financial assets, which lead to a risk of divergence in accounting practice (ii) the modification of financial assets was already an issue that arises in practice; (iii) such transactions were likely to increase given the current economic environment; and (iv) potential issues that could arise under IFRS 9.

Staff recommendation

The staff recommended that the Interpretation Committee finalise the agenda decision because the staff considered that (i) the comment letter did not provide additional information and (ii) the Board members consulted in November 2015 did not express interest in considering a project on this issue.


This issue was not discussed during this meeting due to a lack of time. It will be discussed at the next meeting of the IFRS Interpretations Committee in May 2016.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.