In March 2017, the IC discussed whether there are circumstances in which an entity cannot reliably measure the fair value of growing produce. In particular, the issue centred on whether fruit growing on oil palms could be considered to be an example of a biological asset for which an entity might rebut the fair value presumption set out in IAS 41.30.
In March 2017, the IC discussed whether there are circumstances in which an entity cannot reliably measure the fair value of growing produce. In particular, the issue centred on whether fruit growing on oil palms could be considered to be an example of a biological asset for which an entity might rebut the fair value presumption set out in IAS 41.30.
June 2017
Please see our Interpretations Committee meeting notes for the discussion of the issue and the June 2017 IFRIC Update for the final wording of the decision.
IFRIC reference:
14 Sep 2023
06 Sep 2023
01 Sep 2023
05 Jul 2023
12 Jun 2023
02 Jun 2023