This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

EFRAG draft comment letter on the proposed IFRS Foundation Due Process Handbook

  • EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) (dk green) Image

19 Jul 2012

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has issued a draft comment letter on the proposed IFRS Foundation Due Process Handbook that was published for public comment in May 2012. EFRAG emphasises that the overarching principle of bringing improvement to financial reporting at an acceptable cost should be the sole driver for new or changed standards and interpretations.

In order to achieve this overarching aim, EFRAG formulates eight comments and recommendations for the standard setting process and two for the due process oversight.

Standard setting process:

  • EFRAG welcomes the introduction of a research programme into the IASB due process as this will allow for evidence based agenda setting. EFRAG also suggests concluding the research programme phase by a public consultation phase on the issue and the possible approaches before deciding to add a project to the agenda.
  • EFRAG promotes a shared due process between the IASB and regional and national accounting standards bodies as an effective way to improve transparency and efficiency.
  • EFRAG believes that the Due Process Handbook should contain guiding principles for identifying and analysing users’ needs to establish the link with the objective as defined in the IASB’s Conceptual Framework.
  • EFRAG believes that results of public fatal flaw reviews should be assessed, in a public meeting, by the IASB and only by the staff as they are essential in the identification of potential implementation difficulties or undue costs.
  • EFRAG warns that the IASB staff should support the IASB, never try to guide it. The staff should be allowed to make recommendations, but only after having prepared a fair and balanced representation of various views.
  • As EFRAG observes that no discussion arises at the IASB level when an interpretation is presented for approval, EFRAG recommends that IFRS Interpretations Committee members' dissenting views should be explained publicly.
  • EFRAG urges the Trustees to clearly stipulate that the IFRS Interpretations Committee should not issue any rejection notice that would be akin to an interpretation as some preparers and regulators operate in the expectation that rejection notices are part of the IFRS literature to which preparers should refer.
  • EFRAG believes that every decision made in the standard setting process should be subject to the super majority required for the whole standard.

Due process oversight:

  • EFRAG believes that the focus of the due process oversight should be on substance, and not on form to ensure that the objectives set for the IASB’s due process are indeed met.
  • EFRAG warns of adding too much detail into the Due Process Handbook as that would undermine the principles based character of the standard setting process and leave no room for any flexibility in the due process.

Comments on EFRAG's draft comment letter are invited by 5 September 2012.

Please click for:

  • EFRAG press release with link to the draft comment letter (link to EFRAG website)
  • A summary of the main suggestions of the updated IFRS Foundation Due Process Handbook in our earlier story on the publication of the Trustees' proposals.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.