This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

FASB abandons converged approach to business model assessment

  • FASB (US Financial Accounting Standards Board) (lt blue) Image

30 Jan 2014

At its meeting yesterday to discuss the classification and measurement of financial instruments, the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) tentatively decided not to pursue the converged approach jointly developed by the FASB and IASB (the 'boards') for assessing the business model in which a financial asset is managed.

Under the boards’ converged approach, the classification and measurement of financial assets would have been determined on the basis of an asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics (the so-called “solely payments of principal and interest” test) and the business model under which the asset is managed. At its December 2013 meeting, the FASB had already decided against the development of a converged approach for assessing an asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics, thus both aspects of the converged approach developed at the IASB/FASB joint meeting in November 2013 have now been abandoned.

The FASB discussed and directed the staff to further research the following two alternatives:

  • Retain existing guidance in US GAAP on classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. Under this alternative, the FASB would consider potential refinements to the tainting guidance in ASC 320 Investments — Debt and Equity Securities on investments in held-to-maturity securities.
  • Develop a single classification and measurement model for both loans (including trade receivables) and investments in debt securities. That model would be based on the existing classification and measurement guidance in ASC 320 on investments in securities, except for potential refinements to the tainting guidance.

Under ASC 320 in current US GAAP, entities use one of three categories to classify and measure investments in securities: trading (fair value through net income), available for sale (fair value through other comprehensive income), and held to maturity (amortised cost). Under ASC 310 Receivables, entities use one of two categories to classify and measure loans: held for investment (amortised cost) and held for sale (lower of cost or fair value). Some Board members expressed the view that loans and debt securities are economically similar instruments and should not be subject to different accounting models because of their legal form.

The FASB will consider the results of the staff’s analysis at a future meeting.

For more information, see Deloitte's Accounting Journal Entry and the meeting minutes on the FASB's website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.