This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

CAQ issues professional judgement resource

  • AICPA (American Institute of CPAs) (lt green) Image

04 Sep 2014

The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has issued a 'Professional Judgment Resource', which is "designed to provide auditors with an example of a decision-making process to facilitate important auditing and accounting judgments in a professionally skeptical manner". While the resource was developed with auditors in mind, it can be a useful tool for all participants in the capital markets.

The document was issued in response to concerns regarding auditors' treatment of subjective and challenging matters, including increasingly complex business transactions, principles-based standards, and estimates. It outlines an example of a decision-making process grounded in five essential actions:

    1. Identify and define the issue
    2. Gather the facts and information and identify the relevant literature
    3. Perform the analysis and identify alternatives
    4. Make the decision
    5. Review and complete the documentation and rationale for the conclusion

In addition, the document identifies several of the more common judgement tendencies and traps that can potentially lead to bias and weaken professional skepticism. These are illustrated by examples of these tendencies and strategies for avoiding them are included.

Judgement in financial reporting has received increasing attention in the recent past. During its last meeting the IASB's IFRS Advisory Council discussed principles-based accounting and confirmed that it is reasonable to expect preparers to exercise judgement and that the IASB should not restrict itself by including possible anti-abuse precautions in its standards. Judgement is also a point that is raised in connection with the disclosure overload. In March 2014, the IASB issued ED/2014/1 Disclosure Initiative (Proposed amendments to IAS 1) aimed at clarifying IAS 1 to address perceived impediments to preparers exercising their judgement in presenting their financial reports.

For more information, see the Professional Judgment Resource and press release on the CAQ's Web site.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.