News

iasplcs.gif Image

IAS Plus Newsletter on puttable financial instruments

15 Feb 2008

Deloitte's IFRS Global Office has published a special edition IAS Plus Newsletter on Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1 on puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation.

Our news story of 14 February 2008 (below) announced these revisions.
Click to view IAS Plus Newsletter on Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1 (PDF 101k). You will find all Past IAS Plus Newsletters Here.

 

IVSC (International Valuation Standards Council) (lt green) Image

IVSC announces interim board of trustees

15 Feb 2008

The International Valuation Standards Committee (IVSC) has announced its interim board of trustees that will oversee the restructuring of the IVSC.

The restructuring was announced in November 2007 (see the IAS Plus News Story of 29 Nov 2007). The restructuring will transform IVSC into an independent standard setting organisation that will develop International Valuation Standards acceptable to the international capital markets. Former IASC Foundation Trustee Jens Roder and former IASC Chairman Michael Sharpe are among the seven interim IVSC trustees. Here is the Press Release on IVSC Interim Trustees (PDF 82k).

 

Canada Image

IFRS concept paper from Canadian securities regulators

15 Feb 2008

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) – the consortium of the provincial securities regulators in Canada – has invited public comment on CSA Concept Paper 52-402. The Concept Paper discusses securities regulation issues relating to Canada's upcoming adoption of IFRSs.

The Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) of Canada proposes to that all Canadian publicly accountable enterprises must adopt Canadian IFRS equivalents by 1 January 2011. As CSA rules refer to Canadian generally accepted accounting principles established by the AcSB, the CSA is considering the need for amendments to those rules and is seeking feedback on three main issues:
  • Use of IFRSs by domestic issuers before 1 January 2011. CSA members are leaning toward allowing the use of IFRSs starting in 2009, two years ahead of the AcSB's mandatory changeover.
  • Use of US GAAP by domestic issuers. Currently, Canadian companies that are registered with the US SEC are allowed to use US GAAP rather than Canadian GAAP. The CSA members have tentatively concluded not to allow a domestic issuer to use US GAAP starting in 2009 except existing US GAAP users could continue doing so for up to five years (that is, through 2013).
  • Reference to IFRSs instead of Canadian GAAP in CSA securities rules. The AcSB's current plan is to import IFRSs into Canadian GAAP and to continue using the term 'Canadian GAAP'. The CSA members do not agree with that terminology and believe that the auditor's report should refer to IFRSs as adopted by the IASB rather than to Canadian GAAP. CSA acknowledges that changes to some laws may be required.
Comments on the Concept Paper should be sent by 13 April 2008. Click to:
Canada Image

Canadian standards board confirms 2011 transition to IFRSs

15 Feb 2008

The Canadian Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) has confirmed that use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) will be required in 2011 for publicly accountable profit-oriented enterprises.

IFRSs will replace Canada's current national GAAP for those enterprises. These include listed companies and other profit-oriented enterprises that are responsible to large or diverse groups of stakeholders. The official changeover date is for interim and annual financial statements relating to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2011. Private companies (non-publicly accountable enterprises), and not-for-profit organisations are not required, but are permitted, to adopt IFRSs in 2011. Click for AcSB Press Release (PDF 50k).

 

ifrssm.gif Image

Puttable instruments and obligations arising on liquidation

14 Feb 2008

The IASB has amended IAS 32 'Financial Instruments: Presentation' with respect to the balance sheet classification of puttable financial instruments and obligations arising only on liquidation.

Under the current requirements of IAS 32, if an issuer can be required to pay or transfer cash or another financial asset in return for redeeming or repurchasing a financial instrument, the instrument is classified as a financial liability.

As a result of the amendments, some financial instruments that currently meet the definition of a financial liability will be classified as equity because they represent the residual interest in the net assets of the entity.

The amendments have detailed criteria for identifying such instruments, but they generally would include:

  • Puttable instruments that are subordinate to all other classes of instruments and that entitle the holder to a pro rata share of the entity's net assets in the event of the entity's liquidation. A puttable instrument is a financial instrument that gives the holder the right to put the instrument back to the issuer for cash or another financial asset or is automatically put back to the issuer on the occurrence of an uncertain future event or the death or retirement of the instrument holder.
  • Instruments, or components of instruments, that are subordinate to all other classes of instruments and that impose on the entity an obligation to deliver to another party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation.

The Board also amended IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements to add new disclosure requirements relating to puttable instruments and obligations arising on liquidation.

The amendments result from proposals that were in an Exposure Draft published by the Board in June 2006. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009, with earlier application permitted.

Click for IASB Press Release (PDF 51k).

 

IPSAS (International Public Sector Accounting Standards) (old) Image

Two new public sector standards based on IFRSs

12 Feb 2008

The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) has issued two new International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) that further converge public sector GAAP with IFRSs:

  • IPSAS 25 Employee Benefits. IPSAS 25 sets out the reporting requirements for the four categories of employee benefits dealt with in the IASB's IAS 19 Employee Benefits. These are short-term employee benefits, such as wages and social security contributions; post-employment benefits, including pensions and other retirement benefits; other long-term employee benefits; and termination benefits. The new IPSAS also deals with specific issues for the public sector, including the discount rate related to post-employment benefits, treatment of post-employment benefits provided through composite social security programs, and long-term disability benefits. IPSAS 25 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011.
  • IPSAS 26 Impairment of Cash-Generating Assets. Some public sector entities (other than government business enterprises, which would already be using full IFRSs) may operate assets with the main purpose of generating a commercial return (rather than providing a public service). IPSAS 26, which is based on IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, applies to such assets. It sets out the procedures for a public sector entity to determine whether a cash-generating asset has lost future economic benefit or service potential and to ensure that impairment losses are recognised in its financial reports. Non cash-generating assets, those used primarily for service delivery, are addressed separately in IPSAS 21 Impairment of Non-Cash-Generating Assets. IPSAS 26 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2009.

Click for Press Release (PDF 99k).

bis.gif Image

FSF interim report on stability of the global financial system

11 Feb 2008

The Financial Stability Forum's (FSF) Working Group on Market and Institutional Resilience has presented an Interim Report to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors at their meeting this past weekend in Tokyo.

The IASB is a member of the Working Group. The report discusses the Working Group's views to date on current conditions in the global financial system and the causes of and weaknesses revealed by recent market turbulence. The report proposes broad policy directions for strengthening the resilience of key elements of the financial system in six areas:
  • supervisory framework and oversight;
  • underpinnings of the originate-to-distribute model;
  • the uses and role of credit ratings;
  • market transparency;
  • supervisory and regulatory responsiveness to risks; and
  • authorities' ability to respond to crises.
The policy proposals address a number of accounting and auditing issues. Here are two examples:
  • Financial institutions need to improve the usability of disclosed information about risk exposures and valuations, including those related to structured products and off-balance sheet vehicles. Investors, industry representatives, and auditors should work together to identify the types of relevant and useful disclosures, including those about valuation methodologies and the key valuation assumptions and drivers of changes in value.
  • Authorities should encourage market-led improvements in market transparency and disclosure standards. But a more prescriptive approach by securities market regulators, bank supervisors, and accounting standard setters may prove necessary if these are inadequate.

Click to view Interim Report (PDF 49k).

IASC Foundation (blue) Image

IASCF proposals for a monitoring group, enlarged IASB

11 Feb 2008

In November 2007, the Trustees of the IASC Foundation (IASCF), under which the IASB operates, announced proposals to enhance the organisation's governance arrangements and reinforce the organisation's public accountability (see our News Story of 7 Nov 2007).

Those proposals included creation of a 'monitoring group' of representatives of official organisations, including securities regulators, that would approve Trustee appointments and review Trustee oversight activities, including the adequacy of the annual funding arrangements as well as the overall budget. The monitoring group proposal was jointly Endorsed by IOSCO, SEC, EC, and FSAJ. Subsequently, the trustees began a series of consultations with key stakeholders on those proposals in the build up to the Constitution Review, which is scheduled to start later this year. At their meeting on 29-30 January 2008, the Trustees reached the following further conclusions regarding the Constitution Review (click for Press Release (PDF 67k)):
  • An accelerated consideration of a monitoring group: The Trustees will accelerate consideration of their proposals on the size, composition, and mandate of a monitoring group with the goal of reaching conclusions in the second half of 2008. Initial proposals will be published for comment in the second quarter of 2008.
  • A proposal to expand the IASB to 16 members: At the same time, the Trustees will propose a gradual expansion of the IASB to 16 members. While maintaining the existing Constitutional criteria for selecting members of the IASB, the Trustees will consider whether the Constitution should also explicitly ensure a minimum geographical balance.
  • An extended consultation process on other Constitutional matters: The Trustees intend to publish in the first half of 2008 a discussion document inviting comments and suggestions on other elements of the Constitution. The Trustees will attempt to conclude the broader review of the Constitution by the end of 2009.

 

We have created a New Page for the 2008 Constitution Review. Until completion of the review we will have a link to this page under 'IASB Structure' in the right column of this home page.

 

SEC (old) Image

SEC continues planning for IFRSs for US companies

10 Feb 2008

In a speech titled The SEC Agenda for 2008, US Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox discussed a broad range of issues currently facing the Commission.

One issue is planning an approach for making IFRSs available to US domestic registrants. Click to Download Chairman Cox's Remarks (PDF 77k). Here is an excerpt relating to IFRSs:

Because of the significant progress that has been made in developing IFRS as a high-quality accounting standard – and in light of its rapid and growing acceptance around the world – the Commission last year voted unanimously to take the next step on the SEC's 'roadmap' announced three years ago. As a result, foreign issuers can now file their financial statements with the SEC using IFRS, without need of keeping a second set of books under US GAAP.

Then, last August, the Commission issued a Concept Release seeking advice on whether US issuers should be allowed to choose to prepare financial statements using IFRS. And in December 2007 we held roundtables on this subject and heard from more than two dozen experts. The many comments the Commission has received make one thing exceptionally clear: the rapidly growing acceptance in the rest of the world of IFRS as a high-quality accounting standard will make the US GAAP-IFRS convergence project increasingly important for US investors and issuers. In 2008, the Division of Corporation Finance and the Office of the Chief Accountant, led by Wayne Carnall and Julie Erhardt, will formally propose to the Commission an updated 'roadmap' that lays out a schedule, and appropriate milestones on which the schedule will be conditioned, for continuing the progress that the United States is making in moving to accept IFRS in this country.

 

News default Image

Where do IAS Plus visitors come from?

10 Feb 2008

We had our six millionth visitor last night.

Cumulatively, since we started tracking in May 2003, the top 10 jurisdictions from which visitors to IAS Plus come are United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Hong Kong, China, Australia, France, Malaysia, India, and Canada. Lately, however, there is a marked shift of visitors toward the countries where IFRSs are beginning to be used. Not only is the United States now #1, but also Canada, Pakistan, India, Japan, and South Africa have moved higher in the top 10.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.