News

United States Image

Ready or not, IFRS 9 is here for derivatives

Jun 13, 2018

On June 13, 2018, Accounting Today published an article on how the new International Financial Reporting Standard for financial instruments, IFRS 9, diverges in several key elements and introduces concepts that don't exist under U.S. GAAP.

While the Securities and Exchange Commission expects the two standards to coexist, challenges remain for U.S. companies that have international subsidiaries that will need to report under IFRS 9 for statutory purposes and for U.S. subsidiaries of international companies.

What are turning out to be the most disruptive changes? The areas of divergence that will likely have the largest impact are twofold: the new time value election, and the related requirement to calculate “aligned time value.”

Review the full article on Accounting Today's website.

US_SEC Image

SEC to release letters to companies with serious deficiencies

Jun 12, 2018

On June 12, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance announced that letters sent to issuers that have “serious deficiencies” in their registration statement or offering document will be made available on EDGAR.

Filings with serious deficiencies can be defined as those that are “not minimally compliant with statutory or regulatory requirements.” Letters issued on June 15, 2018, or later will be published first; these letters will appear on EDGAR within 10 calendar days of issuance.

Review the announcement on the SEC’s website.

IFRS - IASB Image

Article on IFRS 17 preparations published

Jun 11, 2018

On June 11, 2018, the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) posted to its website an article "Preparing the market for IFRS 17," in which financial journalist Liz Fisher discusses how the new Standard affects the investor community.

The article noted the "seismic change" IFRS 17 is expected to have on insurance companies as well as the user community. Though implementing the Standard may be turbulent, Ms. Fisher emphasized it's impact: "it will make a huge difference to the consistency and comparability of insurance companies."

The article explains:

  • The "trouble" with IFRS 4, the interim insurance contracts Standard;
  • comparability and transparency; and
  • impact around the world.

Review the article is available on the Boards's website.

Securities - CSA Image

CSA provide additional guidance on securities law implications for offerings of tokens

Jun 11, 2018

On June 11, 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published CSA Staff Notice 46-308 “Securities Law Implications for Offerings of Tokens,” which provides additional guidance on the applicability of securities laws to offerings of coins or tokens, including ones that are commonly referred to as “utility tokens.”

CSA Staff Notice 46-308 outlines specific situations that may have an implication on the presence of one or more of the elements of an investment contract in the context of an offering of coins or tokens.

This notice supplements the CSA’s August 2017 publication of CSA Staff Notice 46-307 Cryptocurrency Offerings, which outlines how securities law requirements may apply to initial coin offerings, initial token offerings, cryptocurrency investment funds and the cryptocurrency platforms trading these products.

Any business planning to raise capital through an offering of coins or tokens should consider whether it involves the distribution of a security.

Review the press release on the CSA's website and the Staff Notice on the member's website.

Canada Image

Canadian government publishes wide-ranging amendments to anti-money laundering laws

Jun 09, 2018

On June 9, 2018, the Canadian Department of Finance has published wide-ranging draft amendments to regulations made under the "Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act 2018" (PCMLTFA) which will affect financial and non-financial entities that provide access to Canada’s financial system, including dealers in virtual currency and foreign money services businesses.

In a summary published by Osler, the objective of the proposed amendments is to bring Canada’s anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regime (AML/ATF Regime) into line with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental body of which Canada is a founding member, which promotes implementation of measures for combatting threats to the integrity of the international financial system. The FATF identified several deficiencies in its last evaluation of Canada in 2015 which have been addressed by proposed amendments in the following areas:

  • customer due diligence requirements are modernized and, in some respects, broadened
  • persons and entities dealing in virtual currency are regulated as money services businesses (MSBs)
  • foreign MSBs are subject to the Canadian AML/ATF Regime to the extent their activities are directed to Canadian customers
  • the deadline for filing suspicious transactions reports (STRs) is shortened from 30 days to 3 days
  • prepaid credit cards and similar open-loop payment products are treated as bank accounts
  • prior to launching new technologies, reporting entities are expected to assess the potential money laundering/terrorist financing risks posed by such technologies on their products and delivery channels
  • certain existing requirements are clarified and technical amendments are made

Review the draft amendments on the Government of Canada's website and the summary on Osler's website.

IFRS - ASAF Image

Summary of the April 2018 ASAF meeting now available

Jun 08, 2018

On June 8, 2018, the staff of the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) have made available a summary of the discussions of the Accounting Standards Advisory Forum (ASAF) meeting held in London on April 16 and 17, 2018.

The topics covered during the meeting were the following (numbers in brackets are ref­er­ences to the cor­re­spond­ing para­graphs of the summary):

  • Rate-regulated activities (1–9): ASAF members discussed (1) unit of account and asset/liability definitions and (2) scope of the model. In addition, the ASAF members discussed the development of communication materials.
  • Disclosure initiative — Principles of disclosure (10–24): ASAF members discussed (1) location of information that includes IFRS information outside of financial statements and non-IFRS information within financial statements and (2) accounting policy disclosures.
  • Commodity loans and related transactions (25–43): ASAF members discussed several topics related to items described in the Board’s January 2018 meeting. These include: (1) the extent that entities in their jurisdictions enter into transactions, (2) diversity in accounting, (3) standard-setting activities, and (4) potential standard-setting activities.
  • Accounting policies and accounting estimates (44–48): ASAF members were provided feedback on Exposure Draft, Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates, and provided views on next steps for the project.
  • Is financial reporting still an effective tool for equity investor in Australia? (49–51): ASAF members viewed a presentation from by the AASB on financial reporting’s effectiveness for equity investors in Australia.
  • Goodwill and impairment (52–71): The ASAF members discussed (1) a staff proposal that amends the impairment testing of goodwill by considering movements in headroom and (2) the IFRS 3 requirement to recognize all identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination separately from goodwill.
  • Primary financial statements (72–88): ASAF members provided views the Board’s tentative decisions to date on the application to financial entities and aggregation and disaggregation.
  • IFRS Foundation Due Process Handbook review (89–99): ASAF member were updated on the Trustees’ review of the Due Process Handbook and provided views on its scope.
  • Project updates and agenda planning (100–104): ASAF members were updated on the IASB research pipeline and provided advice on how to proceed with the post-implementation reviews of IFRS 10, IFRS 11, and IFRS 12.

A full summary of the meeting is available on the Board's website.

CAQ Image

Hyperinflationary economies - updated IPTF watch list available

Jun 08, 2018

On June 8, 2018, the Centre for Audit Quality (CAQ) released the discussion document "Monitoring Inflation in Certain Countries".

IAS 29, Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies defines and provides general guidance for assessing whether a particular jurisdiction's economy is hyperinflationary. But the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) does not identify specific jurisdictions. The International Practices Task Force (IPTF) of the CAQ monitors the status of "highly inflationary" countries. The Task Force's criteria for identifying such countries are similar to those for identifying "hyperinflationary economies" under IAS 29.

The IPTF's discussion document for the May 16, 2018 meeting is now available and states the following view of the Task Force:

Countries with three-year cumulative inflation rates exceeding 100%:

  • Angola
  • South Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Venezuela

Countries with projected three-year cumulative inflation rates exceeding 100%:

  • Argentina
  • Democratic Republic of Congo

Countries where the three-year cumulative inflation rates had exceeded 100% in recent years:

  • Sudan

Countries with recent three-year cumulative inflation rates exceeding 100% after a spike in inflation in a discrete period:

  • Ukraine

Countries with projected three-year cumulative inflation rates between 70% and 100% or with a significant (25% or more) increase in inflation during the current period

  • Egypt
  • Libya
  • Yemen

Review the full list, including exact numbers, detailed explanations of the calculation of the numbers, and observations of the Task Force are available on the CAQ website.

US_SEC Image

Progress Is Being Made: Continued Focus on Addressing Implementation Matters

Jun 07, 2018

On June 7, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released a speech by SEC’s Deputy Chief Accountant, Sagar Teotia, where he reminded companies that the clock is ticking on finalizing disclosures relating to the impact of tax reform. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 was issued in December 2017.

SAB 118 permits companies to assess, record provisional amounts and ultimately finalize disclosure of the financial impact of tax reform over a “measurement period” of up to one year from the date of the legislation’s enactment.  However, Mr. Teotia clarifies that SAB 118 does not allow companies to defer reporting of tax reform’s impact.

The measurement period ends when an entity has completed the process necessary to finalize its assessment of tax reform’s impact – and for certain income tax effects, that could be well before the one year mark.

Review the full speech on the SEC's website.

United States Image

Eliminating Quarterly Guidance

Jun 07, 2018

On June 7, 2018, the Business Roundtable (BRT), the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) announced their support for companies moving away from an expectation of providing quarterly earnings per share guidance and potentially dropping such guidance in the future.

Business Roundtable supports corporate strategies that allocate capital for long-term growth and management of risks, with the goal of producing sustainable value creation. Public companies should be managed for long-term prosperity, not to meet the latest forecast. Such short-termism is unhealthy for America’s public companies and financial markets — which are critical to economic growth and financial prosperity.

Review the press releases from Business Roundtable, the National Association of Corporate Directors and the National Investor Relations Institute and publications from the Wall Street Journal and The Accounting Review.

US_SEC Image

SEC Chief Accountant warns against superimposing additional objectives onto general purpose financial reporting

Jun 06, 2018

On June 6, 2018, Wesley R. Bricker, Chief Accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), gave a speech at the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) on the topic of "The intersection of financial reporting and innovation". While the speech was far more wide ranging, it also contained two messages regarding financial reporting.

The first point made in relation to financial reporting regarded general purpose financial reporting, special purpose financial reporting, and the expectation gap that results from confusing or mixing these two forms of reporting. While general purpose financial reports come with the objective of providing financial information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity, special purpose financial reports are prepared using a particular framework to address specific needs of specific users and these frameworks can include intentions to achieve a certain behaviour. Mr Bricker warned against applying expectations regarding special purpose financial reports to general purpose financial reports and against beginning standard-setting with additional objectives in mind that go beyond providing decision useful financial information.

Nevertheless, Mr. Bricker expressed the belief that general purpose financial reporting needs to continue to evolve and the standard-setters must continue to strive to set standards that provide the best information to a broad baseline of investors and investment advisers while preparers need to use judgement in applying the standards.

The second point Mr. Bricker made followed on from the need to continue to advance general purpose financial reporting to address expectations around financial reporting and any gaps that might exist. He stressed that everyone in the financial reporting structure needs to support the work of the accounting standard-setters and that thinking needs to be shared.

Review the full speech on the SEC's website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.