November

IASB issues podcast on latest Board developments (November 2020)

24 Nov, 2020

The IASB has released a podcast featuring IASB Chair Hans Hoogervorst and IASB Vice-Chair Sue Lloyd discussing deliberations at the November 2020 IASB meeting.

The podcast discusses:

  • the joint education session with the FASB;
  • Post-implementation review of IFRS 10-12;
  • Management commentary;
  • Subsidiaries that are SMEs; and
  • Maintenance and consistent application.

The podcast (12 minutes) can be accessed through the press release on the IASB website.

The detailed notes taken by Deloitte observers at the meeting are available here.

IASB issues podcast on latest Board developments (October 2020)

04 Nov, 2020

The IASB has released a podcast featuring IASB Vice-Chair Sue Lloyd and Executive Technical Director Nili Shah discussing deliberations at the October 2020 IASB meeting.

The podcast discusses:

  • Work plan changes as a result of COVID-19;
  • 2020 Agenda consultation;
  • Management commentary;
  • Disclosure initiative — Subsidiaries that are SMEs;
  • Equity method of accounting; and
  • Maintenance and consistent application.

The podcast (15 minutes) can be accessed through the press release on the IASB website.

The detailed notes taken by Deloitte observers at the meeting are available here.

IASB officially adds PIR of IFRS 9 to its work plan

19 Nov, 2020

The Board has started its post-implementation review (PIR) of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments'.

At its October 2020 meeting, the Board decided unanimously to separate the PIR of the IFRS 9 classification and measurement requirements (including FVOCI equity instruments) from the PIR of the rest of IFRS 9 and to start the PIR on classification and measurement as soon as possible.

One argument brought forward for a separation of classification and measurement was that this part of IFRS 9 did not have a transition resource group (TRG) and thus application issues have not been addressed since publication of the standard. It was also noted that there is not much overlap between classification and measurement and the rest of IFRS 9, so the PIRs can be done separately.

Please see the press release on the IASB website for more information.

IASB publishes discussion paper on business combinations under common control

30 Nov, 2020

On 30 November 2020, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published a discussion paper DP/2020/2 'Business Combinations under Common Control'. The IASB reactivated this topic as a research project in 2012 after the original research project was postponed in 2009 for the time being due to the financial crisis at that time. Comments on the discussion paper are requested by 1 September 2021.

 

Background

Business combinations under common control are excluded from the application of the current IFRS requirements for business combinations. Under IFRSs, there are requirements for the parent consolidated financial statements and for the selling entity, but no rules for the acquiring entity. As a result, the preparers of the financial statements of the acquiring entity must develop an accounting policy to account for such transactions. There are accointing policy choices - both in choosing the method and in presenting the comparative information for the previous period.

In practice, the need to develop a suitable accounting method can lead to different presentations of comparable facts and circumstances. Especially since such transactions often occur during restructuring or the creation of new entities - possibly also for an IPO. For these reasons, the IASB has been pursuing a research project for a long time, which was suspended for a time, but which, after intensive consideration, has now culminated in a discussion paper, which, in terms of process, precedes the development of an exposure draft.

 

Summary of preliminary views

Scope. The proposed requirements would apply to all transactions under common control. There would therefore no longer be any differentiation as to whether or not these transactions have economic substance, i.e. whether they constitute pure capital reorganisations or not.


Accounting method dependent on the existence of non-controlling interests. Following its analysis, the Board came to the preliminary conclusion that not one single method for all transactions is in the best interests of all stakeholders. The objective criterion for determining when a transaction should be accounted for using the acquisition method is the existence of a non-controlling interest in the acquiring entity, or at higher levels in the case of sub-groups. Consequently, the book-value method should be applied to all acquiring entities in which there are no non-controlling interests. The only exception is for acquirers whose shares are not traded on a public market, provided that all non-controlling shareholders have been informed of and have not objected to the proposed use of the book-value method. If all non-controlling interests are held by related parties within the scope of IAS 24, application of the book-value method is mandatory.

Application of the acquisition method. Where the acquisition method is to be applied, it must be applied in accordance with IFRS 3. However, if the consideration given is less than the fair value of the assets and liabilities received, this amount is not recognised in profit or loss but in equity.

Application of the book-value method. The IASB proposes to apply the IFRS carrying amounts of the transferred entity prospectively, i.e. from the date of acquisition. The consideration in the form of assets is to be determined at the carrying amounts of the acquiring entity, liabilities incurred are to be determined using the standards applicable to initial measurement. Any difference between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities received and the consideration given should be recognised in equity. Transaction costs should be recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred. The only exception to this are costs for the issuance of additional equity or debt instruments, which must be recognised in accordance with the provisions of IAS 32.

Disclosures. When applying the acquisition method, the disclosure requirements resulting from IFRS 3 should be disclosed, taking into account the improvements proposed in discussion paper DP/2020/1 Business Combinations - Disclosures, Goodwill and Impairment. However, there are additional requirements with regard to IAS 24 that intended to assist preparers. For acquisitions that must be accounted for using the book-value method, adjusted reporting obligations are proposed based on the disclosures required by IFRS 3. This should enable users to assess the nature, financial impact and benefits of the acquisition. However, it is explicitly not required to disclose financial information for periods prior to the acquisition date. Similarly, no fair value of the consideration given is to be disclosed or additionally determined. However, the amount recognised in equity as the difference between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities received and the consideration given should be disclosed.

The deadline for comments on the discussion paper is 1 September 2021.

 

Additional information

 

IASB publishes editorial corrections

16 Nov, 2020

The IASB has published editorial corrections to IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' and IAS 39 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'.

The errors affect the stand-alone standards only.

Editorial corrections do not change the meaning or application of pronouncements, but instead correct inadvertent errors. The editorial corrections can be viewed on the editorial corrections page of the IASB's website.

IASB publishes proposed amendment to IFRS 16

27 Nov, 2020

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published an exposure draft 'Lease Liability in a Sale and Leaseback (Proposed amendment to IFRS 16)' that aims at clarifying how a seller-lessee should apply the subsequent measurement requirements in IFRS 16 to the lease liability that arises in a sale and leaseback transaction. Comments are requested by 29 March 2021.

 

Background

The IFRS Interpretations Committee received a submission about IFRS 16 Leases and a sale and leaseback transaction with variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate and came to the conclusion (and the IASB agreed) that it would be beneficial to amend IFRS 16 to specify how a seller-lessee should apply the subsequent measurement requirements in IFRS 16 to the lease liability that arises in the sale and leaseback transaction.

The IASB has now published an exposure draft (ED) of a proposed clarifying amendment.

 

Suggested changes

The IASB proposes in ED/2020/4 Lease Liability in a Sale and Leaseback (Proposed amendment to IFRS 16) to improve the sale and leaseback requirements in IFRS 16 by specifying how to apply paragraphs 36–38 of IFRS 16 in subsequently measuring the lease liability that arises in a sale and leaseback transaction. Specifically, the ED proposes that a seller-lessee

  • when applying the IFRS 16 requirements for measuring the right-of-use asset and lease liability arising from the leaseback, determines the proportion of the asset sold that relates to the right of use retained by comparing the discounted present value of the expected payments for the lease to the fair value of the asset sold and
  • subsequently measures the lease liability by reducing the carrying amount to reflect the expected payments for the lease.

A seller-lessee would apply the proposed amendment retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, except when such application to sale and leaseback transactions with variable lease payments would be possible only with the use of hindsight.

The amendment would also add two illustrative examples to IFRS 16

Comments on the proposed changes are requested by 29 March 2021.

 

Effective date

The exposure draft does not contain a proposed effective date as the IASB intends to decide on this after exposure. Early application would be permitted.

 

Additional information

Please click for:

 

IFAC releases training material on IPSAS

10 Nov, 2020

The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has developed a package of training materials to support International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) implementation.

The training materials are aimed primarily at entities currently using a cash basis of accounting and transitioning to, or planning a move to, accrual IPSAS.

The course is structured over ten modules with each broken down into topics including assets, liabilities, financial instruments, and first-time adoption of accrual basis IPSAS.

Please click for more information and access to the materials on the IFAC website.

IFRS Advisory Council membership update

18 Nov, 2020

The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation have announced appointments and re-appointments to the IFRS Advisory Council effective 1 January 2021.

The Advisory Council is the formal advisory body to the Trustees and the IASB. It advises the IFRS Foundation on its strategic direction, technical work plan and priorities.

The new and reappointed members of the Advisory Council are:

  • Kristian Koktvedgaard - BusinessEurope
  • Sibel Ulusoy Tokgöz - Capital Markets Board of Turkey
  • Thorsten Sellhorn - European Accounting Association (EAA)
  • Javier de Frutos - European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies (EFFAS)
  • Saskia Slomp - European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG)
  • Ken Warren - External Reporting (XRB), New Zealand
  • Ron Edmonds - Financial Executives International (FEI)
  • Ian Burger - International Corporate Governance Network
  • Antonio Quesada - International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)
  • Marie Seiller - International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)
  • Alan Trotter - Investment Company Institute
  • Henry Daubeney - Pricewaterhouse Coopers
  • Barbara McGowan - World Bank
  • Eduardo Flores
  • Tania Wimberley 

All appointments take effect 1 January 2021 and are for a three-year period.

In addition, the Trustees note that the following members are stepping down from the Council at the end of 2020 or have already stepped down earlier this year: Areewan Aimdilokwong, Clive Brown, Garth Coppin, Jean Paul Gauzes, Professor Ann Jorissen, Ton Meershoek, Pam O'Connell.

The press release announcing the new appointments can be found on the IASB's website.

IFRS Foundation publishes proposed IFRS Taxonomy update

24 Nov, 2020

The IASB has published PTU/2020/5 'IFRS Taxonomy 2020 — 'General Improvements and Common Practice — IAS 19 'Employee Benefits'''.

The proposed update includes elements to reflect common reporting practice and new and amended labels to clarify the accounting meaning and intended use of some existing elements.

For more information, see the press release and proposed update on the IASB’s website. Comments are requested by 26 January 2021.

IIRC and SASB intend to merge

25 Nov, 2020

The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) have announced their intention to merge into the Value Reporting Foundation, a unified organisation intended to provide investors and corporates with a comprehensive corporate reporting framework across the full range of enterprise value drivers and standards.

The merger is aimed at advancing the work of CDP, CDSB, GRI, IIRC and SASB who in September 2020 released a statement of intent to work together towards comprehensive corporate reporting in a comprehensive corporate reporting system.

The press release notes that Value Reporting Foundation will maintain the IIRC integrated reporting framework that describes all relevant value creation topics and the approach to integrating them in corporate reporting while the SASB standards provide the precise definitions of the data that should be reported for these topics in each industry. The framework and the standards will remain complementary tools with the Value Reporting Foundation facilitating the use of both together.

The merger responds to the ever increasing calls from global investors and corporates to simplify the corporate reporting landscape by having a globally aligned reporting system. The press release stresses that the Value Reporting Foundation, which will be formed by mid-2021, stands ready to work with the IFRS Foundation, IOSCO, EFRAG, CDP, CDSB, and GRI, and others to work towards a set of global and globally accepted standards.

Please click to access the full press release on the SASB website (an identical press release is available on the IIRC website).

GRI and CDSB have posted congratulatory notes to their websites.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.