The research commissioned by the FRC, provides an over-time comparison with, and builds upon, its previous assessment of corporate governance statements by large private companies which looked at companies' 2019/20 statements. The second assessment looked at 2021/22 statements and added a 'user perspective' surveying what information users value most and for what purposes, and how such information is delivered.
The research shows that the Wates Principles continue to be the most widely adopted corporate governance code among large private companies. While there were some improvements in certain disclosure areas compared to 2019/20, the research found that companies continue to struggle with providing meaningful disclosures around key areas including defining company purpose, connecting that purpose to strategy, culture and values, and explaining how stakeholder engagement impacts board decision-making.
The report suggests there is an over-reliance on “boilerplate” disclosures being used rather than disclosures that provide company-specific context. High levels of similarity were found between the corporate governance statements of different companies, and also between reports by the same company in different years. Going forward it is recommended the companies provide context-relevant and time-specific disclosures.
The report aims to demonstrate where some companies may be able to improve reporting to offer additional insight or clarity on their governance procedures. Suggestions included more outcomes-based reporting linking governance activities to company actions, clearer rationales for approaches like remuneration, and better signposting across the annual report.
The FRC indicates that companies applying those suggestions are likely to see an improvement in their governance frameworks and the value of their corporate governance reporting.
A press release, the report and associated podcast are available on the FRC website