This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Deloitte comment letter on financial instruments

  • Deloitte Comment Letter Image

06 Jul 2010

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu has submitted to the IASB our Letter of Comment (47k) on Exposure Draft 2009/12 Financial Instruments: Amortised Cost and Impairment. The ED, issued on 5 November 2009, proposes requirements for how to include credit loss expectations in the amortised cost measurement of financial assets.

We express concerns about the model proposed in the ED:

We agree with the Board's objective in this phase of the IASB project to replace IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39) to address weaknesses of the incurred loss model in IAS 39 that were highlighted during the global financial crisis. An impairment loss model that focuses on an assessment of recoverable cash flows reflecting all current information about the borrower's ability to repay would be an improvement on the current approach in IAS 39 which relies on identification of trigger events and often leads to a delay in loss recognition. However, we have concerns about the specific requirements proposed by the IASB, in particular those to determine, and allocate, the initial estimate of expected credit losses on a financial asset and to use a probability-weighted outcome approach. We believe that this approach will in many cases be unnecessarily complex. Further, the incorporation of potential future economic environments in estimating recoverable cash flows would be extremely complex, costly and burdensome to apply by preparers. The requirement in the ED to forecast future economic environments and events without providing sufficient guidance with respect to the level of objectivity, verifiability, or support for the underpinnings of these inputs presents significant challenges to internal auditors, external auditors, and regulators. Overall, we believe that the measurement principle would not be operational if the Board were to adopt the ED in its current form.

All of our past letters of comment to IASB, IFRIC, IASCF, IASC, and SIC are Here. Click here to go to our Financial Instruments – Comprehensive Project – Issues Relating to Impairment and Provisioning Project Page.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.