This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

FRC responds to IESBA proposed independence changes

  • FRC Image
  • IESBA (International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants) (lt gray) Image

29 Sep 2014

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published its response to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) consultation on proposed changes to independence rules around non-audit services. The FRC supports the objective of the proposals but notes that they are very limited in comparison with those contained in the recently finalised EU Audit Regulation.

IESBA's exposure draft contains three key proposals in the following areas:

  • Management responsibility. The exposure draft proposes additional guidance and clarification regarding what constitutes 'management responsibility' and enhanced guidance on how the auditor can be satisfied that management are fulfilling their responsibilities.
  • Preparing accounting records and financial statements. The exposure draft proposes guidance and clarification on the concept of "routine or mechanical" services relating to the preparation of accounting records and financial statements.
  • Emergency exception. The exposure draft proposes removing the provision that permits an audit firm to provide certain bookkeeping and taxation services to public interest entity audit clients in emergency situations.

In relation to these proposals, the FRC support the majority of the proposals around management responsibility, as well as the changes in relation to the emergency exception and "routine or mechanical" services.

One area in with the FRC has concerns is IESBA's proposal that:

"providing advice and recommendations to assist management in discharging its responsibilities is not assuming a management responsibility."

In this regard, the EU Audit Regulation prohibits auditors from playing any part in the management or decision-making of an audit client which is a Public Interest Entity (PIE), which the FRC believes may potentially conflict with the IESBA proposal. They recommend IESBA consider this further.

The full response can be accessed on the FRC website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.