This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

IFRS Foundation responds to the EC consultation on the impact of IFRS in the EU

  • IFRS Foundation (blue) Image
  • European Union (old) Image

27 Oct 2014

In a response letter to the European Commission (EC), the IFRS Foundation (IFRSF) has provided its views on how the adoption of IFRS has brought positive effects to financial reporting in the EU and noted the importance IFRS in achieving the objectives of the new Commission.

In August 2014, the EC initiated a public consultation where it asked interested parties to provide their thoughts on the impact of IFRS in the EU. In particular, the EC looked for views concerning the scope, relevance, and the cost/benefits of the IAS Regulation; the current EU endorsement mechanism and criteria; quality of IFRS financial statements; and enforcement of IFRSs. The IFRSF letter provides its view on those concerns as well as emphasising two key points.

First, IFRS should be considered as a “global language” for accounting and explains that “jurisdictions have made very few modifications to IFRS, and the few that have been made are generally regarded as temporary steps in the jurisdiction’s plans to adopt IFRS. If jurisdictions such as the EU were to make modifications, they would not be adopting IFRS and so would lose the benefits of using the globally-accepted language of IFRS. EU companies would no longer have the benefit of the global financial reporting passport that IFRS provide, including their ability to access international capital markets using their IFRS financial statements, without reconciliation to local standards. Investors would be deprived of comparable accounts and therefore essential information.”

Second, the IFRSF noted that IFRS is critical in achieving the objectives of the new Commission. The letter states that “[g]iven the global nature of capital markets and the need for comparability within the EU market to mirror internationally-accepted best practice, only IFRS can provide those requirements. The transparent financial reporting provided by companies reporting under IFRS helps participants in capital markets to make more efficient and informed resource allocation and other economic decisions, and makes investment more attractive to capital providers. Having a comparable and familiar financial reporting language is, therefore, a vital feature to encourage the investment that is so necessary for the growth that the Commission seeks for the EU."

The response letter is available on the IASB's website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.