News

Deloitte Comment Letter Image

Deloitte letter of comment on IFRIC D15

28 May 2005

We have posted Deloitte's (PDF 45k), We support the interpretation and offer two suggestions for clarification (excerpt below).

You will find all past comment letters (back to 1995) Here.

We believe the draft Interpretation is an appropriate and practical interpretation of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39) and support its issuance. However, we do have two substantive comments. Firstly, we strongly encourage the IFRIC to clarify whether the assessment of hybrid instruments is required for an acquirer at the time of a business combination. Divergent views are already in existence on this issue, and D15 presents an opportunity to clarify this matter, similar to the issue set out in paragraph 3(b) of D15. Secondly, the IFRIC should clarify that the scope of D15 is limited solely to the 'closely related' decision, and not the other requirements in paragraph 11 of IAS 39.

Deloitte Comment Letter Image

Deloitte comments on proposed IFRS 6 amendments

28 May 2005

We have posted Deloitte's comment letter on the and related amendments to IFRS 1 (PDF 57k), We support the amendments unreservedly.

Here is an excerpt:

We commend the Board in acting promptly to alleviate the concerns of constituents caused by the apparent inconsistency between the wording in IFRS 1 paragraph 36B and the discussion in the basis for conclusions on IFRS 6. We support the amendments as proposed in the exposure draft and encourage the Board to complete its redeliberations and issue the amendments in final form by 30 June 2005.

2005nzifrsnz.gif Image

Comparison of NZ-IFRSs and current NZ GAAP

27 May 2005

Deloitte (New Zealand) has published (PDF 340k).

This guide compares New Zealand 'equivalents' to IFRSs, as adopted by the NZ Financial Reporting Standards Board (FRSB), and New Zealand's current financial reporting standards. In New Zealand, reporting entities are required to adopt NZ-IFRSs at the latest for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007, and they may elect to do so for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. Early adoption before 1 January 2005 is not permitted. When an entity adopts NZ-IFRSs it must do so in their entirety, not piecemeal. There are a number of differences between NZ-IFRSs and IFRSs:
  • wording has been amended to accommodate the New Zealand legislative environment, for example, references to the Financial Reporting Act 1993
  • additional/amended requirements for public benefit entities
  • in some cases the FRSB has permitted only one of a number of options available in the corresponding IFRS
  • additional disclosures.
You will find our other GAAP comparisons Here.
Namibia Image

Namibia adopts IFRSs

27 May 2005

All domestic listed companies in Namibia are required to comply with IFRSs effective 1 January 2005 under the requirements of the Namibian Stock Exchange Act.

Unlisted Namibian companies have the option to use IFRSs or Namibian GAAP. Namibia is working to harmonise national GAAP with IFRSs by 31 December 2007. Here is our complete list of Countries that Use IFRSs.
France Image

Le nouveau monde de l'information financière: IFRS

26 May 2005

The professional accounting body in France – la Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC) – has launched www.focusifrs.com, a website for news about IFRSs.

While most of the content is in French, there are some materials, including press articles and IASB and IFRIC Updates, in English. Focus IFRS includes news from the IASB, the European Commission, EFRAG, CNC (the French accounting standard setter), CESR, and others.
2005ifrsprc.jpg Image

Comparison of IFRSs and Chinese GAAP

26 May 2005

Deloitte (China) has published a comparison of accounting standards in the People's Republic of China and International Financial Reporting Standards as of March 2005. The comparison is available in both English and Chinese.

China has different levels of accounting standards that apply to different classes of entities. The comparison relates to the standards applicable to the largest companies (including all non-financial listed and foreign-invested enterprises) and identifies major accounting recognition and measurement differences. Click to download: We are pleased to grant permission to accounting educators and students to make copies for educational use.
News default Image

Agenda project summaries have been updated

25 May 2005

We have updated the following agenda project summaries to reflect discussions and decisions at the IASB's May 2005 meeting: Accounting Standards for Small and Medium-Sized Entities Changes in Contributions to Employee Share Purchase Plans (ESPPs) Conceptual Framework Convergence: IAS 37 Financial Instruments: Disclosures IAS 39 Revisions - Fair Value Option Insurance Contracts Phase II Liabilities Arising from Participating in a Specific Market – Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Measurement Performance Reporting .

EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) (dk green) Image

EFRAG comment letter on IFRIC D12-13-14

25 May 2005

The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) has posted its Letter of Comment on IFRIC D12, D13, and D14 (PDF 89k) on accounting for service concession arrangements.

EFRAG's overall conclusion: "We have a number of concerns with the draft interpretations. As a result, we would like to avoid an outcome where final interpretations would be issued along the lines of the draft interpretations."
News default Image

SEC Chairman Donaldson speaks about convergence

25 May 2005

In (PDF 51k), US SEC Chairman William H.

Donaldson introduced his comments on the benefits of global financial reporting standards with a quote from the late Walter Wriston: "Capital will always go where it is welcomed, and stay where it is well treated." Chairman Donaldson said:

We are witnessing real progress towards international convergence of accounting and disclosure standards. True convergence will ultimately make it easier for investors to compare competing securities investment opportunities – with little concern about geographical boundaries – and decide which offers the best potential return. Investors will drive the push towards convergence around a transparent system of accounting because the market will penalize investments whose features are not well understood. And if a biotech company in Bangalore offers a better product than a biotech company in Boston, and is transparent in telling its story, common accounting and disclosure standards should make it easier for investors to understand where their capital is likely to be better treated.

United Kingdom Image

Proposed wording of IFRS audit reports in the UK

25 May 2005

The United Kingdom Auditing Practices Board (APB) has issued for comment a draft bulletin titled Auditor's Reports on Financial Statements.

For all UK companies whose securities are publicly traded in the EU, the APB proposes that the auditor's report refer to conformity with IFRSs adopted for use in the European Union as the primary reporting framework:

In our opinion the group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with those IFRSs adopted for use in the European Union....

The draft bulletin notes that many companies will be in a position of complying with both IFRSs as issued by the IASB and those IFRSs adopted for use in the European Union. If that is the case, and if the entity wants the auditor also to express an opinion about conformity with IFRSs, the draft bulletin proposes that the auditor separately state a second opinion with regards to full IFRSs, as follows:

As explained in Note X, the group in addition to complying with its legal obligation to comply with those IFRSs adopted for use in the European Union, has also complied with the IFRSs as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. In our opinion the group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs....

The draft bulletin may be downloaded from the APB's Website. Comments are requested by 1 August 2005.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.