FASB Makes Progress on Classification and Measurement
At its August 10 meeting, the FASB made a number of tentative decisions on three aspects of the classification and measurement portion of its project on the accounting for financial instruments: (1) presentation, (2) the equity method of accounting, and (3) an entity’s “own credit” risk.
Presentation
The Board voted to require public entities to:
- Present fair value parenthetically on the face of the balance sheet for assets and liabilities measured at amortized cost, excluding core deposit liabilities. (Note that short-term receivables and payables would be exempted from this requirement.)
- Determine these fair value measurements in accordance with ASC 820.1
- Disclose a present value amount for core deposit liabilities. (Note that the Board requested the staff to further develop this present value measurement attribute and will discuss this issue at a future meeting. See editor’s note below).
- Exempt short-term receivables and payables from the parenthetical disclosure of fair value on the face of the balance sheet.
The FASB plans to address these presentation and disclosure requirements for nonpublic entities at a future meeting.
The Board also tentatively decided to require all entities (public and nonpublic) to:
- Separately present financial assets and financial liabilities on the balance sheet by classification and measurement category (an affirmation of a proposal in the FASB’s May 2010 exposure draft (ED)2).
- Present amortized cost parenthetically on the face of the balance sheet for an entity’s own debt measured at fair value.
- Present in net income an aggregate amount of realized and unrealized gains or losses for financial assets measured at fair value through net income (FV-NI) and, similarly, for financial liabilities measured at FV-NI.
- Separately present cumulative credit losses on the face of the balance sheet for financial assets measured at amortized cost.
- Separately present the following items in net income for financial assets and liabilities measured at amortized cost or for financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income:
- Current-period interest income (financial assets) and expense (financial liabilities).
- Credit losses for the current period (financial assets).
- Realized gains or losses (both financial assets and liabilities).
Equity Method Accounting
The FASB’s May 2010 ED proposed eliminating the fair value option for equity method investments. However, at its May 26, 2011 meeting, the Board directed the staff to explore alternative criteria under which entities would be required to measure at FV-NI investments otherwise eligible for the equity method of accounting. At yesterday’s meeting, the Board tentatively decided to require entities to measure such investments at FV-NI if they are held for sale when the investment initially becomes eligible for the equity method of accounting. The FASB’s August 10, 2011, Action Alert notes that the following indicators would be determinative that an entity’s investment that qualifies for the equity method of accounting is held for sale:
1. The entity has specifically identified potential exit strategies.
2. The entity has defined the time at which it expects to exit the investment.
In addition, an entity would not be required to determine, upon an investment’s qualification for the equity method of accounting, the specific strategy to exit the investment. The time at which an entity expects to exit the investment may be based on a range of dates, or the occurrence of a contingent event such as the achievement of specific milestones or investment objectives.
An entity would not be required to reassess its determination of whether an investment eligible for the equity method of accounting is held for sale. Thus, it would not have to subsequently measure at fair value existing equity method investments determined not to be held for sale or subsequently apply the equity method of accounting to investments previously determined to be held for sale when first evaluated.
Own Credit
The Board tentatively decided that it would not require separate presentation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities measured at FV-NI attributable to changes in an entity’s “own credit” risk.
Editor’s Note: As redeliberations of this project continue, the population of liabilities subsequently measured at fair value may change. The Board indicated during yesterday’s meeting that a significant change in this population may lead the Board to revisit this tentative decision. |
For information about the Board’s previous tentative decisions on the classification and measurement of financial instruments, see Deloitte’s May 10, 2011, Heads Up newsletter and May 27, June 1, June 13, and June 22, 2011, journal entries.
[1] For titles of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) references, see Deloitte’s "Titles of Topics and Subtopics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification."
[2] FASB Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
[3] FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments.