This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

News

Document (dk gray) Image

EBA consults on guidance on accounting for expected credit losses

27 Jul 2016

The European Banking Authority (EBA) has launched a consultation on draft guidelines on credit institutions' credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses.

The EBA draft guidelines build on the guidance by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in December 2015 on the same matter and feature a detailed section on the application of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. The draft guidance notes:

The EBA welcomes the move from an incurred loss model to an ECL model under IFRS 9. IFRS 9 is, overall, an improvement compared to IAS 39 in the accounting for financial instruments and the changes on credit loss provisioning should contribute in addressing the G20’s concerns about the issue of ‘too little, too late’ recognition of credit losses and improve the accounting recognition of loan loss provisions by incorporating a broader range of credit information. IFRS 9 is therefore expected to address some prudential concerns and contribute to financial stability. However, the application of IFRS 9 also requires the use of judgement in the ECL assessment and measurement process which could potentially affect the consistent application of IFRS 9 across credit institutions and the comparability of credit institutions’ financial statements.

The EBA notes that the objective of the proposed guidelines is to be in line with the BCBS guidance. The EBA guidelines would also not prevent credit institutions from meeting the impairment requirements in IFRS 9.

Comments on the draft guidance are requested by 26 October 2016. The EBA aims to finalise the proposed guidelines during the fourth quarter of 2016 or first quarter of 2017, taking into account the comments received during the consultation. The guidelines should be implemented by 1 January 2018.

Please click for the following additional information on the EBA website:

KASB (Korean Accounting Standards Board) (lt blue) Image
AASB (Australian Accounting Standards Board) (lt blue) Image

KASB and AASB publish final study on the influence of cultural background and translation on the interpretation of IFRSs

26 Jul 2016

In December 2015, the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the Korea Accounting Standards Board (KASB) reported on a joint research project on IFRS implementation at the ASAF meeting that month. The final report on the project that explored how cultural background and translation affect the interpretation of the terms that are used in IFRS is now available.

The findings in the final report are consistent with those detailed in December 2015: differences in cultures and languages can lead to different interpretations of terms used in IFRSs - a fact that is not helped by the circumstance that the IASB itself uses a variety of terms for similar fact patterns and not even consistenly across standards. Accordingly, the report emphasises that it will be useful for the IASB to consider narrowing down the number of terms, to give considerable attention to how terms might be interpreted and translated in different jurisdictions when developing a standard, to consider developing principles and guidance that could be applied consistently across the standards, and to use standard-setting outreach and consultative processes to obtain input on translation and interpretation issues in different jurisdictions.

The final report, which forms KASB Research Report No.39 and AASB Research Report No.2, can be accessed through the press release on the KASB website.

 

IASB webcast (blue) Image

IASB posts webcast on IFRS 9 forward-looking information

25 Jul 2016

The IASB has made available a webcast discussing forward-looking information in the application of the expected credit loss impairment requirements in IFRS 9.

The webcast, which features IASB member Sue Lloyd, Technical Director Kumar Dasgupta, and Practice Fellow Uni Choi, covers the following topics:

  • “when multiple scenarios are relevant and the concept of non-linearity;
  • consistency of scenarios;
  • probability-weighted assessment of significant increase in credit risk; and
  • approaches to incorporating forward-looking scenarios”

The webcast is available on the IASB’s website.

ASBJ (Accounting Standards Board of Japan) Image

ASBJ publishes amendments to 'Japan’s Modified International Standards'

25 Jul 2016

In June 2015, the Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ) issued "Japan’s Modified International Standards (JMIS): Accounting Standards Comprising IFRSs and the ASBJ Modifications". JMIS are standards and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) with certain 'deletions or modifications' where considered necessary. The first set of JMIS comprised standards issued by the IASB as at 31 December 2012. Since then, the ASBJ examined the Standards issued by the IASB during 2013 and today has issued an updated version of JMIS.

New or amended Standards issued by the IASB during 2013 covered by the endorsement process for this round were:

  • IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 7 and IAS 39)
  • IFRIC 21 Levies
  • Recoverable Amount Disclosure for Non-Financial Assets
  • Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting
  • Defined Benefit Plans: Employee Contributions
  • Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle
  • Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle

The ASBJ has published several documents in relation with this new round of endorsement including a press release and a new version of ASBJ Modification Accounting Standard No. 2. All documents are available on the ASBJ website.

IFRS Foundation (blue) Image

Analysis of IFRS application by listed companies around the world

25 Jul 2016

The IFRS Foundation has released an analysis of the number of listed companies using IFRSs around the world.

The analysis combines information about the numbers of listed companies published on the websites of the two major global associations of securities exchanges: World Federation of Exchanges (WFE) and Federation of European and Asian Stock Exchanges (FEAS) with the information on the use of IFRSs around the world.

The analysis concludes that of the approximately 48,000 domestic listed companies on the 85 major securities exchanges in the world more than 25,000 use IFRSs. Not surprisingly, of those domestic listed companies that do not use IFRSs, over 80 per cent are listed in China, India, Japan, and the United States.

Please click to access the full analysis on the IASB website.

Deloitte document (mid gray) Image

We comment on three IFRIC tentative agenda decisions

22 Jul 2016

We have published our comment letters to the IFRS Interpretations Committee on tentative agenda decisions not to take onto the Committee’s agenda (1) service concession arrangements for which the infrastructure is leased (IFRIC 12), (2) fees and costs included in the '10 per cent' test for the purposes of derecognition (IAS 39), and (3) written puts over non-controlling interests to be settled by a variable number of the parent’s shares (IAS 32).

We agree with the IFRS Interpretations Committee's decision not to add a request for clarification of how an operator accounts for a service concession arrangement not including any construction or upgrade services for which the infrastructure is leased onto its agenda for the reasons set out in the tentative agenda decision. Please click to access the full comment letter.

We do agree with the IFRS Interpretations Committee's decision not to add the issue of which fees and costs should be included in the ‘10 per cent’ test for the purposes of derecognition of a financial liability onto its agenda, however, we believe a more significant clarification of the standard is warranted as well as, since there is currently significant diversity, explicit transition provisions. Please click to access the full comment letter.

We do not agree with the IFRS Interpretations Committee's decision not to add the request for guidance on written puts over non-controlling interests that will, or may, be settled by the exchange of a variable number of the parent’s own equity instruments onto its agenda because it will (1) promote structuring and increase diversity in practice over what is likely to be a significant period of time before the FICE project is completed and (2) general comments on NCI puts in the tentative agenda decision could give rise to ‘contamination’ and bring uncertainty and diversity into what is now a largely consistent practice around more traditional, cash-settled, NCI put arrangements. Please click to access the full comment letter.

EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) (dk green) Image

Video recordings from the EFRAG@15 event

22 Jul 2016

On 6 July 2016, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) held a celebration event and seminar to mark its 15th anniversary and welcome its new leadership.

We had already reported on the event and provided you with a summary of all speeches and discussions. EFRAG now follows suit and makes available on its website transcripts of the speeches and recordings of the two panel discussions.

SEC (US Securities and Exchange Commission) (dark gray) Image

US SEC names interim chief accountant

22 Jul 2016

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has named Wesley R. Bricker, deputy chief accountant since 2015, as interim chief accountant.

Mr Bricker will be responsible for the activities of the Office of the Chief Accountant as James V. Schnurr, current chief accountant, recovers from a serious accident. Mr Bricker will serve as the principal advisor to the Commission on accounting and auditing matters. He will also be responsible for the oversight of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).

Please click for the announcement on the SEC website.

IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) (blue) Image
ICAEW (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales) (lt green) Image

ICAEW and IFRS Foundation announce IFRS 16 conference

21 Jul 2016

The IFRS Foundation, along with the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), will be hosting an IFRS conference on the implementation of IFRS 16, "Leases," in London on 7 October 2016.

The conference will cover topics on:

  • Implementation issues.
  • IFRS 16 transition.
  • Definition of a lease.
  • Business implications.
  • Disclosure requirements.

More in­for­ma­tion on the con­fer­ence is available on the ICAEW website.

IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) (blue) Image

IASB updates work plan

21 Jul 2016

Following its July 2016 meeting, the IASB has updated its work plan. The IASB has reorganised the way projects are presented, however, the main problem that progress on the individual projects cannot be traced properly anymore unless the Board makes definite progress or has to make larger corrections has not been rectified. In this news item, we explain the changed presentation and point out the few project changes that can be identified since the previous work plan.

The main change in the work plan presentation is that the Board’s active research projects and standard-setting projects are presented on one page, with research appearing before standard-setting. This was done to indicate that research projects typically lead on to standard-setting projects (if the research provides sufficient evidence that standard-setting is needed), to avoid implying that standard-setting projects are automatically more important or more urgent than research projects, and to avoid the confusion caused by some projects appearing on both the research and major projects pages.

The research projects now also include milestones for progress made and expected, however, they are of the same kind as the ones used for major projects so that slippage cannot be detected from one month to the next. Also, research projects are no longer classified as being in either the assessment or the development phase as the distinction was confusing to users. Projects that are in the “research pipeline” are no longer presented in the work plan at all.

The page dedicated to narrow scope amendments and IFRS maintenance now also includes IFRS Taxonomy activities and developments in the post-implementation reviews.

Changes to the projects itself include:

Research projects

Standard-setting and related projects (major projects)

Implementation projects (narrow scope amendments)

The revised IASB work plan is available on the IASB's website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.