This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.


IASB publishes editorial corrections


The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published a batch of editorial corrections that retract a previous correction and impact consequential amendments, stand-alone standards, and the IASB's “2014 IFRS (Red Book)”, "A Guide Through IFRS 2014", and "2015 IFRS (Blue Book)".

Retraction of a previous editorial correction affects the following standard:

  • IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures

Editorial cor­rec­tions to con­se­quen­tial amend­ments affect the following standards:

Editorial cor­rec­tions affect the following in­di­vid­ual pro­nounce­ments:

Editorial cor­rec­tions to the 2014 IFRS (Red Book), A Guide through IFRS 2014 and 2015 IFRS (Blue Book) affect the following standards:

  • IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
  • IFRIC 9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives

Editorial cor­rec­tions do not change the meaning or ap­pli­ca­tion of pro­nounce­ments, but instead correct in­ad­ver­tent errors. Full details of the editorial cor­rec­tions are available on the IASB website.

IFRS 2015 'Red Book' now available


The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has announced that the 2015 edition of the Bound Volume of International Financial Reporting Standards (the 'Red Book') is now available.

The 'Red Book' contains all official pronouncements that have an effective date after 1 January 2015. Accordingly, the 2015 includes the following changes made since 1 January 2014: IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, IFRS 14 Regulatory Deferral Accounts, IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2012–2014 Cycle, as well as amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11, IFRS 12, IAS 1, IAS 16, IAS 27, IAS 28, IAS 38, and IAS 41.

eIFRS and Com­pre­hen­sive sub­scribers can now access the elec­tronic files of the 2015 IFRS (Red Book) via the Latest Additions section of eIFRS (you will be required to provide your login details).

The Red Book is also available through the IASB's Web Shop. Copies are priced at £70 each, plus shipping. Discounts are available for multiple copies, academics/students and residents of middle and low-in­come countries.

Research report published into human capital management reporting


The Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (CIPD) has published a research report that explores investor views on the value and availability of human capital management (HCM) reporting, the main barriers to better HCM practice and whether consistent reporting on agreed core HCM information would be useful as a means of improving the quality of reporting in this area.

The study is based on 16 interviews with investors, researchers and standard-setters. Human capital is defined in the study as “the value of people at work and their collective knowledge, skills, abilities and capacity to develop and innovate”.  Human capital management is the process which "enables organisations to make more productive use of their people through measurements, analysis and evaluation".  Human capital management reporting refers to quantitative and qualitative information reporting on these activities.  

The research report highlights that whilst some organisations do present people-related data in their annual reports “very few” actually describe how this information links into value-creation for their business. 

The research report also indicates that “respondents believe that company reporting on HCM should be promoted and improved” and “that the quality of HCM reporting is not as good as it should be”; although no respondents indicated a desire to include the value of human capital on a company’s balance sheet.   The research concludes that:

It’s evident that investors want to use HCM data in combination with other perspectives on company performance to develop a more holistic view of their investments.

A number of barriers to HCM reporting such as confusion over HCM terminology and measures and also a lack of encouragement from investors for better quality HCM reporting  are highlighted in the research report.  Significantly, the research report indicates that investors “don’t recognise this information as powerful and pertinent”.  Investors do, however, consider that four key metrics (total cost of workforce employed, recruitment costs, total investment in training and development and employee engagement survey scores) proposed to standardise external HCM reporting represented “a step forward in CM reporting”.

In light of the findings and perceived barriers to HCM reporting, the research report offers a series of recommendations for both increasing demand among investors and for improving reporting practice.  It is hoped that this reported information will then “improve decision-making, justify investments in people, and demonstrate to external stakeholders [that organisations] are led and managed for the long-term”.    

The research report provides recommendations under a number of headings:

  • what interest investors can do;
  • what asset owners can do;
  • what gatekeepers can do;
  • what professional education bodies can do;
  • what reporting companies can do; and
  • what policy-makers and government can do.

The full report can be downloaded from the CIPD website.

Two papers regarding measurement aspects in the Conceptual Framework


For the upcoming meeting of the Accounting Standards Advisory Forum (ASAF), which is to be held at the IASB's offices in London on 26-27 March 2015, the Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ) has submitted 'Identification, Description and Classification of Measurement Bases' and 'Role of "Nature of an Entity’s Business Activities" in Accounting Standard-Setting'.

In the first paper, the ASBJ provides its view on the IASB's tentative decisions regarding identification, description and categorisation of measurement bases. The ASBJ believes that the IASB's tentative decision to have a binary classification (classifying measurement bases into historical cost and current value) is insufficient. Therefore, the ASBJ suggests an alternative approach that would classify measurement bases on the basis of (a) whether inputs for measurements need to be updated (the ASBJ envisions three categories: fully-updated inputs, partially-updated inputs, and locked-in inputs) and (b) whether market participants assumptions or entity-specific assumptions need to be adopted when measuring an asset or a liability.

In the second paper, the ASBJ underlines its view that the nature of an entity's business activities has significant effect on various aspects of accounting standard-setting and that there should be an overarching description in the Conceptual Framework that should be applied consistently throughout the standard-setting process. The ASBJ thus disagrees with the IASB's tentative decision that the forthcoming Exposure Draft of possibles changes to the Conceptual Framework should not provide a single over-arching description of how the nature of an entity's business activities would affect standard-setting. In the paper, the ASBJ identifies questions that need to be ansered in this context and suggests principles for classifying and describing the nature of an entity's business activity.

Both papers can be accessed through the press release on the ASBJ website.

Two new GRI publications


The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) has published 'Linking GRI and CDP - How are GRI's G4 Guidelines and CDP's 2015 Climate change questions aligned?' and 'Defining materiality: What matters to reporters and investors'.

The first document is a linkage document similar to the document on linking the G4 Guidelines and the new EU Directive on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information (published by GRI in February 2015) and the table connecting corporate non-financial reporting approaches (published by the CDSB in February 2015). The guidance reveals how GRI's G4 Guidelines and CDP's 2015 climate change questions are aligned so that duplication of disclosure efforts can be avoided. This harmonisation will help companies to streamline their disclosure efforts and improve the consistency and comparability of environmental data. Please click to download Linking GRI and CDP from the GRI website.

The second document provides the results of research into materiality from the reporter's perspective, as expounded in GRI reports, and compares this with the investor perspective of materiality. The research reveals an overall high degree of overlap between the topics considered material by reporting organisations, and those considered material by investors. The research also underlines the value that an analysis of the most material issues provides for both companies and investors. Please click to download Defining materiality from the GRI website.

UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework


Supported by the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, the first comprehensive guidance for companies to report on human rights issues in line with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) has been launched. The framework will help companies wanting to improve their reporting on human rights and provides guidance on identifying human rights content for inclusion in an integrated report.

The framework provides a concise set of questions and offers companies clear and straightforward guidance on how to answer these questions with relevant and meaningful information about their human rights policies, processes and performance. It is also intended as an incentive to improve these policies and processes and the performance over time.

The framework is the first of two guidance frameworks around the UNGPs. The second  - expected to be published in early 2016 - will be an assurance framework. It will provide guidance for assurance providers on how to appropriately assess and assure the information reported by companies in line with the UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework.

Please click to access the framework on the newly created UNGP reporting website.

'IFRS and Global Standards: A Canadian Perspective'


On 13 April 2015, CPA Canada offers a webinar to discuss the work of the IASB to establish International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as the global standard for financial information, as well as the role that Canada plays in influencing the development of international standards. The webinar will be hosted by the Chair of the Accounting Standards Board, Linda Mezon; her guests will be International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) Chair Hans Hoogervorst and Board member, Stephen Cooper.

Application of IFRSs has been mandatory in Canada since 2011 although there were exceptions for investment entities and rate regulated entities. Canada has since been an active and important voice in the development of IFRSs. The Canadian standard-setter AcSB is also an ASAF member.

The topics to be discussed during the webinar are:

  • Complexity in accounting standards
  • Disclosure overload
  • Global effective dates of new standards
  • Key implementation concerns for revenue and credit impairment
  • Latest developments on leases or insurance and other projects

Registration for the webinar is free. Participants are asked to submit questions on the topics above (or other topics) when they register. Please click for registration and more information on the webinar.

Summary of the ITCG February 2015 meeting


The IASB has issued its meeting notes on the IFRS Taxonomy Consultative Group's (ITCG) meeting held on 11 February 2015.

Topics discussed were:

  • Exposure Draft Disclosure Initiative (Proposed Amendments to IAS 7)
    ITCG members were pre­sen­ted with an update on the exposure draft, which includes the proposed IFRS Taxonomy Update as accompanying material.
  • Approaches for a potential 2015/2016 Common Practice project
    The staff sum­marised its research on potential approaches to determine the scope of a 2015/2016 Common Practice project and presented a combined approach consisting of “an empirical review focussing on the disclosures of specific activities” and a review of the disclosures in Standards with upcoming IASB post-implementation reviews during 2015/2016. In general, the ITCG agreed with the staff’s combined approach.
  • Terms and conditions of using the IFRS Taxonomy
    A description of the changes to the IFRS Taxonomy’s terms and conditions was presented to the ITCG. These changes are expected to be implemented around the same time as the issuance of the 2015 IFRS Taxonomy.

For more information, see the meeting notes on the IASB’s website.

Report recommends enhanced governance arrangements for IPSAS


The IPSASB Governance Review Group has published it's final recommendations on the future governance of the IPSASB. The Review Group concludes that the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) should continue to operate under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). At the same time, however, the group recommends that a new governance body, the Public Interest Committee, should be established to ensure that the public interest is served by the standard-setting activities of the IPSASB.

The final report is the result of a public consultation that was conducted from 17 January to 30 April 2014 and discussions held at the Review Group's meetings on 31 May 2013 and 22 September 2014. Among the questions asked in the consultation paper was whether the needed strengthening of the monitoring and oversight of the IPSASB would best be served by moving it under the auspices of the IFRS Foundation, whether it should be established as a standard-setter in its own right or whether the IPSASB could continue to work under the auspices of the IFAC if the governance arrangements were enhanced.

The Review Group's final report contains the following recommendations:

  • The IPSASB should continue to operate under the auspices of the IFAC.
  • A new governance body (Public Interest Committee) should be established to ensure that the public interest is served by the standard-setting activities of the IPSASB.
  • The Committee should be independent from IFAC and distinct from the existing governance bodies overseeing the IFAC's private sector standard-setting activities.
  • The Committee would review and advise the IFAC and the IPSASB on the terms of reference, the nomination and appointment of members, and the procedures for formulating the strategy and work plan and development of IPSAS of the IPSASB.
  • The Committee should not have a direct role in the development, adoption, and implementation of accounting standards.
  • The Committee should conduct a first review of the terms of reference, nomination procedures, and standard-setting arrangements no later than the first semester of 2015.
  • The Committee should meet at least annually thereafter to review progress against the recommendations following from their review.
  • The initial membership of the Committee should include individuals with expertise in public sector financial reporting and an interest in promoting high-quality and internationally comparable financial information. Members should not be compensated and serve for a limited period (not longer than three years).
  • The functioning of the Committee should be defined in public Terms of Reference.
  • The Committee will receive reports from the IFAC and the IPSASB regarding procedures and progress against goals.
  • The IFAC should establish a separate Consultative Advisory Group (CAG) for the IPSASB.
  • A further public consultation on the improvements to the IPSASB's governance arrangements should be undertaken no later than 2020.

Please click for access to the full report on the IFAC website. It also contains an appendix with suggested Terms of Reference for the Public Interest Committee.

Agenda for the upcoming meeting of the IASB's Rate-regulated Activities Consultative Group


The IASB's Rate-regulated Activities Consultative Group will meet in London on Wednesday, 4 March 2015. Main purpose of the meeting is to discuss an overview of the feedback received on the Discussion Paper on rate regulation, disclosure requirements, performance, types of regulatory deferral account balances, and the interaction with IFRIC 12.

The full agenda for the meeting is summarised below:

Wednesday, 4 March 2015 (10:15-16:00)

  • Overview of papers
  • Overview of feedback received
  • User information needs
  • What is performance?
  • What types of regulatory deferral account balances are there?
  • Service concession arrangements
  • Next steps and closing remarks

Agenda papers for this meeting are available on the IASB's website.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.