This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Primary financial statements

Date recorded:

The consultation document—a discussion paper or an exposure draft? (Agenda Paper 21A)

Background

The purpose of this paper was to ask the Board whether it plans to publish a Discussion Paper (DP) or an Exposure Draft (ED) to obtain feedback on the project proposals. The staff plan to seek permission to begin the balloting process on the consultation document at a later stage.

Staff analysis

The staff think that the Board has sufficient information and understand the potential problems and solutions to proceed without a DP. Furthermore, it would be more effective and efficient to publish an ED.

The staff considered whether to present the proposals as amendments to existing IFRS Standards or as a new IFRS Standard if the Board were to publish an ED. The staff preferred developing a new Standard because the Board could structure proposed and existing requirements in a clearer manner, improve the drafting of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements without changing the requirements and a new Standard could be more prominent than the revision of an existing Standard.

Staff recommendations

The staff recommended that the Board publish an ED rather than a DP.

Board discussion

All the Board members supported the staff’s recommendation to publish an ED because they have a good understanding of the issues facing the project and because the project is focused on presentation rather than recognition and measurement, i.e. it will not change the fundamental principles set out in IAS 1. The Board members highlighted that it would be more efficient to publish an ED because better feedback can be provided on a more precise drafting which is difficult to achieve with a DP. The Board members recommended that the staff consider the pros and cons of developing a new Standard for this project during drafting.

Board decision

All 14 Board members voted in favour for issuing an ED instead of a DP.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.