This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

FASB chairman's views on a global reporting system

  • FASB (old) Image

31 Dec 2007

We have posted a speech by Robert H Herz, Chairman of the US Financial Accounting Standards Board, titled Towards a Global Reporting System: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?.

In his remarks, Mr Herz posed a series of questions:
  • Why the movement towards global financial reporting?
  • But what exactly is the end goal?
  • What are the key elements of such a system?
  • Where are we now?
  • So what's needed to achieve a global reporting system?
    • What's needed internationally?
    • What's needed in the US?
  • OK, so where should we head?
In response to the last question (where should we head), Mr Herz identified 'three possible endgames':
  1. 'Mutual recognition' only
  2. 'Mutual recognition' plus 'two-GAAP' system for US registrants
  3. A single set of high-quality international standards for registrants (and perhaps others)
Mr Herz stated that:

"FASB and FAF support option 3 (single set of high-quality international standards).... We advocate a well planned 'improve and adopt' approach to transitioning the US to IFRSs – improvement through continued joint projects between IASB and FASB in major areas, and directly adopt other parts of IFRS."

Click to view Chairman Herz speech Towards a Global Reporting System: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? (PDF 70k)

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.