This site uses cookies to provide you with a more responsive and personalised service. By using this site you agree to our use of cookies. Please read our cookie notice for more information on the cookies we use and how to delete or block them.
The full functionality of our site is not supported on your browser version, or you may have 'compatibility mode' selected. Please turn off compatibility mode, upgrade your browser to at least Internet Explorer 9, or try using another browser such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

Our views on IASB's financial instruments discussion paper

  • Deloitte Comment Letter Image

20 Sep 2008

Deloitte has submitted a Letter of Comment on the IASB's Discussion Paper Reducing Complexity in Reporting Financial Instruments. In general, we express serious reservations about the possible approaches examined in the Discussion Paper.

As an alternative, our letter sets out an approach that, whilst still incorporating a mixed measurement attribute model, we believe would represent a significant improvement over the current guidance in IFRSs. Below are excerpts from our letter.

We welcome the IASB's efforts to improve financial reporting for financial instruments. We believe that current guidance under IFRS is complex and requires significant improvements to reduce the inherent complexity.

However, to meet the goal of improving reporting for financial instruments by reducing complexity it is important that complexity is properly defined and that any change made to existing Standards should not result in a mere shift of complexity from one constituent to another.

In addition, the DP fails to address important areas, notably scope and derecognition, of financial instruments accounting that also fall outside the IASB's other concurrent projects or, where they are within existing projects, these would be completed only with a significant time lag to the financial instruments project. We believe that guidance on these issues influences the assessments made on the proposals of the DP.

Furthermore, we do not agree with the implicit assumption of the DP that full fair value accounting would be the ultimate improvement to financial instruments accounting. We believe such a conclusion would be premature at this point. We believe that at the moment, amending existing Standards, possibly over a longer period, would be a feasible way to improve financial instruments accounting significantly for all constituents without undue costs or efforts.

Click to view Letter of Comment (PDF 243k). Past comment letters are Here.

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.