September

Business combinations added to WSS agenda

22 Sep 2007

A discussion of the IASB's project on Business Combinations Phase 2 has been added to the agenda of the World Standard Setters (WSS) meeting on Tuesday morning 25 September 2007.

You will find the full updated agenda for that meeting in our News Story of 5 September 2007.

Over 1.4 million IFRS e-Learning modules downloaded

21 Sep 2007

As of 20 September 2007, 1,409,645 Deloitte IFRS e-learning modules have been downloaded from IAS Plus.

The total number of visitors to the IFRS e-Learning website was 4,975,649. Deloitte's IFRS e-learning was launched at the end of January 2004. Many of the downloaded modules have multiple users because organisations are permitted to install them on their own servers for the internal use of their employees or students. In addition, several million additional modules have been completed online and offline by Deloitte staff. You can always access IFRS e-Learning without charge by clicking on the light bulb icon on the IAS Plus home page. Thirty-five modules are now available covering virtually all IFRSs. In our News Story of 18 September 2007, we reported on our plans for adding new modules and updating existing ones. We are making the Deloitte IFRS e-Learning available in the public interest without charge, and that includes upgrades.

 

Notes from the September 2007 IASB meeting day 3

21 Sep 2007

The IASB held its monthly Board meeting at its offices in London from 18-21 September 2007 (no meeting on 20 September).

Click here for the preliminary and unofficial Notes Taken by Deloitte Observers at the meeting. The IASB will meet with World Standard Setters on Monday and Tuesday 24 and 25 September 2007 at the Renaissance Chancery Court Hotel in London. You will find the agenda for that meeting in our News Story of 5 September 2007.

 

Comment deadline on SME Exposure Draft extended

21 Sep 2007

At its meeting on 19 September, the IASB agreed to extend the deadline for comments on the proposed IFRS for SMEs to 30 November 2007. The deadline for submitting field test results is also extended to 30 November 2007. The Board decided to extend the comment deadline primarily to allow entities participating in the field tests and those assisting such entities more time to prepare their comments on the exposure draft.

The Board strongly encourages entities and organisations that are not involved in the field testing to submit their comments on the exposure draft by the original 1 October 2007 deadline.

 

Notes from the September 2007 IASB meeting day 2

20 Sep 2007

The IASB held its monthly Board meeting at its offices in London from 18-21 September 2007 (no meeting on 20 September).

Click here for the preliminary and unofficial Notes Taken by Deloitte Observers at the meeting. The IASB will meet with World Standard Setters on Monday and Tuesday 24 and 25 September 2007 at the Renaissance Chancery Court Hotel in London. You will find the agenda for that meeting in our News Story of 5 September 2007.

 

Notes from the September 2007 IASB meeting day 1

19 Sep 2007

The IASB held its monthly Board meeting at its offices in London from 18-21 September 2007 (no meeting on 20 September).

Click here for the preliminary and unofficial Notes Taken by Deloitte Observers at the first day of the meeting. The IASB will meet with World Standard Setters on Monday and Tuesday 24 and 25 September 2007 at the Renaissance Chancery Court Hotel in London. You will find the agenda for that meeting in our News Story of 5 September 2007.

 

UK ASB finds EC comments on SME ED 'disappointing'

19 Sep 2007

Ian Mackintosh, Chairman of the United Kingdom Accounting Standards Board, has written to European Internal Markets and Services Commissioner Charlie McCreevy expressing disappointment at the negative stance toward the proposed IFRS for SMEs that Commissioner McCreevy expressed in his remarks at a public event in Portugal on 13 September 2007 (see our News Story of 14 September 2007).

Mr Mackintosh said that "based on the results of a formal consultation and public meetings held in both the UK and the Republic of Ireland, the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) would like to be able to apply the IFRS for SMEs." Click to Download Mr Mackintosh's Letter (PDF 22k).

The responses we had [to the ASB's invitation to comment on the IASB's SME Exposure Draft] expressed a large degree of support for the ED. While most respondents did not see the proposed IFRS for SMEs as being suitable for small, and in particular micro, entities, there was a strong majority in favour of the standard being available for application by middle tier and larger companies that – in line with the IASB's definition – do not have public accountability and publish general purpose financial statements for external users. This view is consistent with the discussions that were held in the four public meetings in which the ASB participated with the major accountancy bodies in the UK and Ireland.

On the evidence of the feedback the ASB has received, it is disappointing that the Commission appears to be taking such a negative stance on the IASB's proposed IFRS for SMEs and seeming to rule out the possibility of Member States applying the standard.

 

New Zealand delays IFRS equivalents for small companies

19 Sep 2007

The New Zealand Accounting Standards Review Board (ASRB) and the Financial Reporting Standards Board (FRSB) have announced a decision to delay the mandatory adoption of NZ IFRSs for certain small entities.

Financial reporting by small and medium sized entities (SMEs) has been the subject of recent world-wide debate. As a result of this, the IASB has produced the exposure draft of a Standard for financial reporting for SMEs. In addition, Australia has recently conducted a review of SME reporting, and in New Zealand there has been extensive consultation on the issue. The Minister of Commerce, the Hon Lianne Dalziel, recently advised the ASRB and FRSB that a government review of the financial reporting requirements applying to small and medium-sized companies under the Financial Reporting Act (the FRA) will commence in mid-2008.

As a result, the ASRB and FRSB have decided to delay, until further notice, the mandatory adoption of NZ IFRSs for certain small entities, defined as follows:

  • Companies that are not issuers as defined by the FRA, in either the current or preceding accounting period and that:
    • are not required by section 19 of the FRA to file their financial statements; and
    • are not large, as defined by section 19A(b) of the FRA. A company is large if at least two of the following apply:
      • total assets of the company and its subsidiaries (if any) exceed NZ$10,000,000;
      • turnover or the company and its subsidiaries (if any) exceeds NZ$20,000,000; or
      • the company and its subsidiaries (if any) have 50 or more full-time equivalent employees.
  • Other entities that:
    • are not subject to the FRA; and
    • are not publicly accountable or large as defined in the Framework for Differential Reporting. An entity is large if at least two of the following apply:
      • total assets exceed NZ$10,000,000;
      • total income exceeds NZ$20,000,000; or
      • 50 or more full-time equivalent employees.
At this stage, the delay is for an indefinite period. Entities taking advantage of the delay should continue to use existing NZ GAAP financial reporting standards. Click for:

 

Updates, new modules planned for our IFRS e-Learning

18 Sep 2007

The Deloitte IFRS e-Learning modules are regularly updated.

It's a good idea to check periodically that you have the latest version. If you enter the e-Learning area (click on light bulb icon on the IAS Plus home page) there is a list of the latest version numbers and also a separate page with a complete history of updates for each module. You can check the version number on previously downloaded modules by right-clicking at any point in the module. The dialog box will tell you the version you have. We are making the Deloitte IFRS e-Learning available in the public interest without charge, and that includes upgrades.

Updates to existing IFRS e-Learning modules under development: We are working on updates to the following modules to reflect recent changes to the Standards and Interpretations. We expect to release them in early 2008:

  • IASs 16, 17, 23, 28, 36, 32/39, and 37
  • IFRSs 1 and 2
Two new modules are in the planning stage:
  • IFRS 8
  • IFRIC 12

 

Heads Up on accounting for convertible debt

16 Sep 2007

We have posted the 7 September 2007 Edition of the Heads Up Newsletter published by Deloitte & Touche LLP (United States).

This issue of Heads Up summarises the impact that proposed FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-a would have on the financial statements of issuers of convertible debt securities. The guidance is proposed to be effective for fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2007 and would be retrospectively applied in prior-period financial statements issued for comparison purposes.

The proposed FSP, titled Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), would require 'split accounting' on initial recognition, that is, separation of the convertible security into two components:

  • A debt component representing the issuer's contractual obligation to pay principal and interest.
  • An equity component representing the holder's option to convert the debt security into equity of the issuer or an equivalent amount of cash.
This is similar to the IAS 32 requirement, except that IAS 32 applies to issuance of all compound financial instruments whereas FSP APB 14-a would apply only to convertibles that may be cash-settled. It would not affect the accounting for more traditional types of convertible debt securities that cannot be settled in cash upon conversion. Such convertible debt securities would continue, typically, to be accounted for wholly as debt.

Click to view 7 September 2007 Edition of the Heads Up Newsletter (PDF 142k).

Correction list for hyphenation

These words serve as exceptions. Once entered, they are only hyphenated at the specified hyphenation points. Each word should be on a separate line.